Browsing by Author "Caliyurt, Kiymet Tunca"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1

Citation - WoS: 60
Citation - Scopus: 74
Does ownership type affect environmental disclosure?
(Emerald Group Holdings Ltd., 2021) Ece Acar; Kıymet Tunca Çaliyurt; Yasemin Zengin Karaibrahimoglu; Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu, Yasemin; Tunca Çalıyurt, Kıymet; Caliyurt, Kiymet Tunca; Acar, Ece
Purpose: In recent years firms tend to direct their attention in communicating their environmental actions with their stakeholders. However the level of environmental disclosers varies significantly among firms. This paper aims to explain the variation in environmental disclosure of firms based on their ownership type namely – state ownership and institutional ownership. The study further aims to understand whether and how the relationship between ownership structure and environmental disclosure changes regarding countries’ development levels. Design/methodology/approach: This paper uses a sample of 27847 firm-year observations from 72 countries/economic districts between the years 2002 and 2017 and regression analysis to test how the relationship between different ownership structures and environmental disclosure and whether this relation is conditional on countries’ development levels. Findings: This study finds that firms with higher state ownership have higher environmental disclosures and higher institutional ownership has a negative effect on environmental disclosures. Furthermore this paper also documents that firms with higher state ownership and operating in developed countries have incrementally higher environmental disclosure relative to firms operating in developing countries. Research limitations/implications: The study has limitations that would provide possible starting points for further research. The first limitation is related to the environmental disclosure measure which reflects the level of environmental disclosure of firms based on their disclosure information given in the Thomson Reuters Asset4 database. A more refined measure can be constructed using hand-collected data based on linguistic analysis which may reflect not only the level of the disclosure but also the quality of the environmental disclosure. The second limitation is the limited focus of the study toward state and institutional shareholding. Therefore future research may consider examining the different types of ownership such as family ownership. Practical implications: The findings of the study may help policymakers and regulators to consider the potential impact of various ownership types on environmental disclosures. Also given the impact of countries’ development levels regulators should consider that a one-size-fits-all is not applicable in environmental disclosures. Therefore each country should consider the institutional dynamics of their operating environment to set appropriate regulations to enhance environmental disclosures. Social implications: From a social perspective the findings indicate that firms’ stakeholder engagement via environmental disclosures depends on the type of the controlling shareholders. Originality/value: This study contributes to the literature by developing a new construct for environmental disclosure based on Biodiversity Climate Change Environmental Investments and Spill Impact Reduction performance measures. Further grounding on legitimacy and stakeholder theories this study shows the influence of ownership type on environmental disclosures and how this effect changes in accordance with the countries’ development. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.