Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Chau, Kwok-wing"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 29
    Citation - Scopus: 37
    Soil moisture estimation using novel bio-inspired soft computing approaches
    (Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2022) Roozbeh Moazenzadeh; Babak Mohammadi; Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari; K. W. Chau; Moazenzadeh, Roozbeh; Chau, Kwok-wing; Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh; Mohammadi, Babak
    Soil moisture (SM) is of paramount importance in irrigation scheduling infiltration runoff and agricultural drought monitoring. This work aimed at evaluating the performance of the classical ANFIS (Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System) model as well as ANFIS coupled with three bio-inspired metaheuristic optimization methods including whale optimization algorithm (ANFIS-WOA) krill herd algorithm (ANFIS-KHA) and firefly algorithm (ANFIS-FA) in estimating SM. Daily air temperature relative humidity wind speed and sunshine hours data at Istanbul Bolge station in Turkey and soil temperature values measured over 2008–2009 were fed into the models under six different scenarios. ANFIS-WOA (RMSE = 1.68 MAPE = 0.04) and ANFIS (RMSE = 2.55 MAPE = 0.07) exhibited the best and worst performance in SM estimation respectively. All three hybrid models (ANFIS-WOA ANFIS-KHA and ANFIS-FA) improved SM estimates reducing RMSE by 34 28 and 27% relative to the base ANFIS model respectively. A more detailed analysis of model performances in estimating moisture content over three intervals including [15–25) [25–35) and ≥35% revealed that ANFIS-WOA has had the lowest errors with RMSEs of 1.69 1.89 and 1.55 in the three SM intervals respectively. From the perspective of under- or over-estimation of moisture values ANFIS-WOA (RMSE = 1.44 MAPE = 0.03) in under-estimation set and ANFIS-KHA (RMSE = 1.94 MAPE = 0.05) in over-estimation set showed the highest accuracies. Overall all three hybrid models performed better in the underestimation set compared to overestimation set. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback