Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Ergenoglu, Ahmet Mete"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - WoS: 11
    Citation - Scopus: 15
    Which Should Be the Preferred Technique during Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy: Hemostatic Sutures or Bipolar Electrocoagulation? A Randomized Controlled Prospective Study of Long-Term Ovarian Reserve
    (SAGE Publications Inc. claims@sagepub.com, 2017) Cagdas Sahin; Ali Osman Akdemir; Ahmet Mete Ergenoǧlu; Banu Ozgurel; Ahmet Özgür Yeniel; Dilek Taşkiran; Fatih Şendaǧ; Ergenoglu, Ahmet Mete; Sahin, Cagdas; Akdemir, Ali; Yeniel, Ahmet Ozgur; Ozgurel, Banu; Taskiran, Dilek; Sendag, Fatih
    The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term effects of different laparoscopic hemostatic techniques on ovarian reserve after ovarian cystectomy. Ninety patients with unilateral ovarian cysts were recruited and randomly distributed into 2 groups. Laparoscopic stripping cystectomy was performed in all patients. Afterward cystectomy hemostasis was achieved via hemostatic suture or bipolar electrocoagulation. Serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) were determined preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 3 and 12 months and patients were evaluated for residual ovarian volume antral follicle count and pregnancy. The statistical difference was determined between the 2 groups in terms of AMH levels at 3 months (hemostatic suture group = 3.17 ± 3.40 vs bipolar electrocoagulation group = 2.38 ± 2.57 P =.006) and 12 months (hemostatic suture group = 3.71 ± 3.09 vs bipolar electrocoagulation group = 2.78 ± 2.85 P =.005). In addition in the hemostatic suture group there was no statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative AMH levels (P =.165) and between the postoperative antral follicle count (P =.779) and the residual ovarian volume (P =.248) whereas in the bipolar electrocoagulation group postoperative AMH levels were lower than preoperative levels (P =.028) and postoperative residual ovarian volumes at 3 and 12 months were lower than those at 1 month (P =.001). Nonetheless pregnancy rates were not significantly different (P =.546). Bipolar electrocoagulation is more destructive compared with hemostatic suture. However the ovarian reserve does not decrease further during the follow-up period. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback