Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "di Stefano, Danilo"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Conference Object
    Citation - WoS: 9
    Citation - Scopus: 16
    Impacts of problem scale and sampling strategy on surrogate model accuracy: An application of surrogate-based optimization in building design
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2016) Ding Yang; Yimin Sun; Danilo Di Stefano; Michela Turrin; I. Sevil Sariyildiz; di Stefano, Danilo; Turrin, Michela; Sariyildiz, Sevil; Sun, Yimin; Yang, Ding
    Surrogate-based Optimization is a useful approach when the objective function is computationally expensive to evaluate compared to Simulation-based Optimization. In the surrogate-based method analytically tractable 'surrogate models' (also known as 'Response Surface Models - RSMs' or 'metamodels') are constructed and validated for each optimization objective and constraint at relatively low computational cost. They are useful for replacing the time-consuming simulations during the optimization, quickly locating the area where the optimum is expected to be for further search, and gaining insight into the global behavior of the system. Nevertheless there are still concerns about the surrogate model accuracy and the number of simulations necessary to get a reasonably accurate surrogate model. This paper aims to unveil: 1) the possible impacts of problem scale and sampling strategy on the surrogate model accuracy, and 2) the potential of Surrogatebased Optimization in finding high quality solutions for building envelope design optimization problems. For this purpose a series of multi-objective optimization test cases that mainly consider daylight and energy performance were conducted within the same time frame. Then the results were compared in pair based on which discussions were made. Finally the corresponding conclusions were obtained after the comparative study. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback