Enhancing student learning in architectural design studios: A pentagon and DEMATEL-based study on new learning components and interaction dynamics

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2025

Authors

Fatma Kürüm Varolgüneş
Süleyman İpek
Sedat Aras

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media B.V.

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Architectural design pedagogy is indeed complex. At the early stages basic design principles should be addressed and the design process should be taught with its multidisciplinary variables to enable each student to develop an individual approach. In this regard the objective of this study is to propose strategies for enhancing students’ learning and production abilities within the context of architectural education. The present study also considers the interactions and learning processes of students in design studios. The study has yielded hypotheses that underscore the necessity for the incorporation of novel and dynamic learning elements to facilitate and reinforce this process alongside the significance of interactions between all these elements. In this context the educational processes and components of architectural design studios were initially examined and processes and components supporting student development were subsequently identified. In order to provide support for the identified hypotheses a pentagon model was created and relationship network diagrams and DEMATEL analyses were conducted. Furthermore the model was evaluated through a case study conducted with first-year students enrolled in the architectural design course during the fall term of 2022–2023 at the Department of Architecture of Bingöl University. A significant outcome of this study is the provision of a guide for researchers and studio instructors in architectural education which details the progression of design studios. Testing the proposed model in various studios and educational settings will contribute to the development of the identified hypotheses and the created model. © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Architectural Design Process, Dematel, Learner Types, Learning Styles, Pentagon Model, Architectural Design, Curricula, Integrated Circuit Design, Interiors (building), Studios, Teaching, Architectural Design Process, Architectural Education, Component Dynamics, Dematel, Design Studios, Design-process, Enhancing Student Learning, Learner Type, Learningstyles, Pentagon Model, Students, Architectural design, Curricula, Integrated circuit design, Interiors (building), Studios, Teaching, Architectural design process, Architectural education, Component dynamics, DEMATEL, Design studios, Design-process, Enhancing student learning, Learner type, Learningstyles, Pentagon model, Students, Dematel, Architectural Design Process, Pentagon Model, Learning Styles, Learner Types

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Volume

35

Issue

4

Start Page

1619

End Page

1647
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 10

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
12.9863

Sustainable Development Goals