Experience Sampling Methodology: A Systematic Review and Discussion for Organizational Research

dc.contributor.author Ozge Can
dc.contributor.author Can, Ozge
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:51:07Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract In organizational research growing attention has been given to the dynamic nature of workplace relationships and how such dynamic processes shape key behavioural outcomes. Experience sampling methodology (ESM) brings more opportunity than any other research option to examine such fluctuations and relevant causal relationships. ESM can be described as a quantitative method which allows individuals to assess discrete evaluative states on multiple events by combining three distinct elements, person variables and occasion. Despite its increasing prevalence and popularity however there has been only a few attempts to investigate the most appropriate design measurement and analysis choices for experience sampling data. Even though ESM has been utilized in organizational research for some time systematic investigations regarding how these issues have been addressed and how the method has been applied to specific organizational topics are limited. This study provides a systematic and critical assessment of the use of ESM in current organizational research (2010-2020) by reviewing a random sample of 50 ESM studies indexed in ISI Web of Science with the aim of identifying the current state of practice. The selected studies were analysed based on several methodological aspects including the type of ESM protocol applied sample characteristics data sources specified interval and total duration of data collection structure and properties of designated measures analytic strategy and the research model to be tested. Findings show that organization studies vary considerably based on how they design and implement ESM. Moreover despite the availability of good practices many studies fail to attain recommended standards about sample size data collection procedures data characteristics and measurement quality. As such this paper offers several insights regarding how timebased within-person frameworks can be improved in future studies to account for dynamic organizational phenomena. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi 10.34190/JBRM.18.2.005
dc.identifier.issn 14777029
dc.identifier.issn 1477-7029
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-85100193261
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85100193261&doi=10.34190%2FJBRM.18.2.005&partnerID=40&md5=f0582ad7a0fa4dea4489d69b34e2ba96
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/9271
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.34190/JBRM.18.2.005
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited
dc.relation.ispartof Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods
dc.subject Dynamic Processes, Event-sampling, Experience Sampling, Organizational Research, Repeated Measures, Within-person Studies
dc.subject Experience Sampling
dc.subject Organizational Research
dc.subject Event-sampling
dc.subject Within-Person Studies
dc.subject Dynamic Processes
dc.subject Repeated Measures
dc.title Experience Sampling Methodology: A Systematic Review and Discussion for Organizational Research
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Can, Ozge (55951641600)
gdc.author.scopusid 55951641600
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Can O.] Yasar University, Izmir, Turkey
gdc.description.endpage 141
gdc.description.issue 2
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
gdc.description.startpage 129
gdc.description.volume 18
gdc.identifier.openalex W3118661998
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.4072764E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.1782387E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.8765
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.73
gdc.opencitations.count 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 20
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 5
gdc.scopus.citedcount 5
gdc.virtual.author Can, Özge
oaire.citation.endPage 141
oaire.citation.startPage 129
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Can- Ozge (55951641600)
publicationissue.issueNumber 2
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 18
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 5253fc26-0ed8-4c0c-9a13-b03fb06ebbac
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 5253fc26-0ed8-4c0c-9a13-b03fb06ebbac
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files