Frontoparietal tDCS Benefits Visual Working Memory in Older Adults With Low Working Memory Capacity
| dc.contributor.author | Hector Arciniega | |
| dc.contributor.author | Filiz Gozenman | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kevin T. Jones | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jaclyn A. Stephens | |
| dc.contributor.author | Marian E. Berryhill | |
| dc.date | MAR 13 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T16:23:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Working memory (WM) permits maintenance of information over brief delays and is an essential executive function. Unfortunately WM is subject to age-related decline. Some evidence supports the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to improve visual WM. A gap in knowledge is an understanding of the mechanism characterizing these tDCS linked effects. To address this gap we compared the effects of two tDCS montages designed on visual working memory (VWM) performance. The bifrontal montage was designed to stimulate the heightened bilateral frontal activity observed in aging adults. The unilateral frontoparietal montage was designed to stimulate activation patterns observed in young adults. Participants completed three sessions (bilateral frontal right frontoparietal sham) of anodal tDCS (20 min 2 mA). During stimulation participants performed a visual long-term memory (LTM) control task and a visual WM task. There was no effect of tDCS on the LTM task. Participants receiving right unilateral tDCS showed a WM benefit. This pattern was most robust in older adults with low WM capacity. To address the concern that the key difference between the two tDCS montages could be tDCS over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) we included new analyses from a previous study applying tDCS targeting the PPC paired with a recognition VWM task. No significant main effects were found. A subsequent experiment in young adults found no significant effect of either tDCS montage on either task. These data indicate that tDCS montage age and WM capacity should be considered when designing tDCS protocols. We interpret these findings as suggestive that protocols designed to restore more youthful patterns of brain activity are superior to those that compensate for age-related changes. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00057 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1663-4365 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2018.00057 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7718 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | FRONTIERS MEDIA SA | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience | |
| dc.source | FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE | |
| dc.subject | working memory, tDCS, aging, visual working memory, visual working memory capacity | |
| dc.subject | DIRECT-CURRENT STIMULATION, AGE-RELATED-CHANGES, SHORT-TERM-MEMORY, PREDICTS INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, POSTERIOR-ANTERIOR SHIFT, NEURAL MECHANISMS, BRAIN ACTIVITY, PARIETAL LOBE, DIVIDED ATTENTION, HEALTHY | |
| dc.title | Frontoparietal tDCS Benefits Visual Working Memory in Older Adults With Low Working Memory Capacity | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.volume | 10 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2793016637 | |
| gdc.identifier.pmid | 29593522 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.oaire.accesstype | GOLD | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 20.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 3.215978E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Aging | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Cognitive Neuroscience | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | aging | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | 150 | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | visual working memory capacity | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | working memory | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | tDCS | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | visual working memory | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | RC321-571 | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Neuroscience | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 3.1151753E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 05 social sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 03 medical and health sciences | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0302 clinical medicine | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 2.6465 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.9 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 53 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 146 | |
| gdc.plumx.pubmedcites | 24 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 47 | |
| person.identifier.orcid | Berryhill- Marian/0000-0002-8218-6587 | |
| project.funder.name | institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the NIH [P20GM103650], National Science Foundation (NSF) [OIA 1632849], NSF [OIA 1632738] | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 10 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |
