Avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions of a fluidized bed coal combustor and a heat recovery steam generator
| dc.contributor.author | Meliha Callak | |
| dc.contributor.author | Firuz Balkan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arif Hepbasli | |
| dc.date | JUL 1 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T16:22:02Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Advanced exergy analysis was performed using the actual operational data taken from a fluidized bed coal combustor (FBCC) and a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) in a textile plant located at Torbali Izmir. First the conventional exergy analysis of the units was carried out. The exergetic efficiencies of the units were found to be 44.2% and 46.2% respectively. Advanced exergy analysis was then performed by splitting the exergy destructions of the units into avoidable and unavoidable parts. The avoidable exergy destruction rates of the FBCC and the HRSG were determined to be 2999 kW and 760 kW according to the measurements. Correspondingly the exergy efficiencies were modified to 53.1% and 48.1% respectively. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.039 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0196-8904 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.039 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7183 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Energy Conversion and Management | |
| dc.source | ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT | |
| dc.subject | Energy analysis, Exergy analysis, Advanced exergy analysis, Fluidized bed, Textile plant | |
| dc.subject | SYSTEM, GAS | |
| dc.title | Avoidable and unavoidable exergy destructions of a fluidized bed coal combustor and a heat recovery steam generator | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.endpage | 58 | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 54 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 98 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W2022840817 | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 15.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 4.359794E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Fluidized bed | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Exergy analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Advanced exergy analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Textile plant | |
| gdc.oaire.keywords | Energy analysis | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 6.234396E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | National | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 5.0492 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.95 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 28 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 15 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 28 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 30 | |
| oaire.citation.endPage | 58 | |
| oaire.citation.startPage | 54 | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 98 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |