Two Scheduling Rule Comparisons for Operations of Shuttles in Tier-to-Tier SBS/RS
Loading...

Date
2022
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study and compare two different scheduling rules for operations of transactions in shuttle-based storage and retrieval system (SBS/RS) to observe how scheduling rule affects the system performance. SBS/RS is one of the emerging automated warehousing technologies mostly utilized by large distribution centers due to its advantages of fast transaction process rate. Although the increased transaction rate is because of the system (warehouse) design of having multiple numbers of autonomous shuttles in the system operational rules such as scheduling of waiting transactions in queues may also play a significant role in increasing the system performance. For this purpose we implement first-in-first-out (FIFO) and shortest processes (i.e. travel) time scheduling rules for selecting waiting transactions in shuttle queues to investigate how these rules affect the performance of the system. We simulate the system under different racking designs and arrival rate scenarios and observe the system performance metrics in terms of average cycle time (e.g. throughput rate) and average energy consumption per transaction separately. The results suggest that the SPT scheduling rule outperforms FIFO rule especially for the throughput rate performance metric.
Description
Keywords
Shuttle-based storage and retrieval system, Tier-to-tier SBS/RS, Automated warehousing, SBS/RS, Warehousing, STORAGE, PERFORMANCE, SYSTEMS, MODEL, Tier-to-Tier SBS/RS, SBS/RS, Warehousing, Shuttle-Based Storage and Retrieval System, Automated Warehousing
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
3
Source
Global Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Its Application Areas (GJCIE)
Volume
Issue
Start Page
91
End Page
100
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 1
Google Scholar™


