Analysis and design of an air to air heat exchanger used in energy recovery systems

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2022

Authors

Helin Ülgen Elmacioǧlu
Irem Özsevgin
Cennet Kocabiyik
Nezir Yağız Çam
Levent Bilir

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Erol Kurt

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

With the continuous worldwide energy use increase energy efficiency is gaining high importance. Consequently many methods have been investigated for potential energy savings. One of these methods is the use of heat recovery systems. These systems basically re-use waste heat and reduce energy consumption. Also they are increasingly used to reduce heating and cooling demands of buildings. Their main feature is to provide fresh air to the place which is heated by the exhaust air with the help of a heat exchanger (HEX) working between two different temperature sources. The most commonly used types of heat exchangers in ventilation systems are cross-flow and counter-flow heat exchangers. Cross-flow heat exchangers have a thermal efficiency in the range of 50-75% while counter-flow heat exchangers have 75-95%. Many studies have been carried out to increase the efficiency of this type of heat exchangers. In this study different designs of crossflow and counter-flow exchangers are compared using ANSYS Fluent software. The aim is to determine how the plate surface geometry affects heat transfer and pressure drop. It is aimed to find the optimum design with maximum efficiency high heat transfer and low pressure drop for heat exchangers. As a result it has been observed that thermal efficiency increased from 18% to 60% when changing from cross flow to counter flow in flat plate design while it increased from 25% to 77% in enhanced plate designs. For enhanced designs counter flow heat exchanger is 52% more efficient than cross flow heat exchanger. Also improvements to increase the surface area and turbulence in both flow types have increased heat transfer and thermal efficiency. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Ansys-fluent Analysis, Counter-flow, Cross-flow, Heat Exchanger Design, Heat Recovery, Drops, Energy Efficiency, Energy Utilization, Heat Exchangers, Heat Transfer, Potential Energy, Pressure Drop, Thermal Efficiency, Ventilation, Waste Heat Utilization, Air-to-air Heat Exchanger, Ansys-fluent Analyse, Counter-flow Heat Exchangers, Counterflow, Cross Flows, Cross-flow Heat Exchangers, Fluent Analysis, Heat Exchanger Design, Plate Design, Thermal-efficiency, Waste Heat, Drops, Energy efficiency, Energy utilization, Heat exchangers, Heat transfer, Potential energy, Pressure drop, Thermal efficiency, Ventilation, Waste heat utilization, Air-to-air heat exchanger, ANSYS-fluent analyse, Counter-flow heat exchangers, Counterflow, Cross flows, Cross-flow heat exchangers, Fluent analysis, Heat exchanger design, Plate design, Thermal-efficiency, Waste heat, Heat Recovery, Counter-flow, ANSYS-Fluent Analysis, Cross-flow, Heat Exchanger Design, Mechanical Engineering, Makine Mühendisliği, ANSYS-Fluent analysis;Counter-flow;Cross-flow;Heat exchanger design;Heat recovery

Fields of Science

0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Journal of Energy Systems

Volume

6

Issue

1

Start Page

108

End Page

130
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 22

SCOPUS™ Citations

1

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0993

Sustainable Development Goals

AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION