Does an Abstract Mind-Set Increase the Internal Consistency of Moral Attitudes and Strengthen Individualizing Foundations?

dc.contributor.author Sinan Alper
dc.contributor.author Onurcan Yilmaz
dc.date APR
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T16:21:27Z
dc.date.issued 2020
dc.description.abstract Recent research suggests that experimentally inducing an abstract (vs. a concrete) mind-set enhances political sophistication by increasing the consistency in political attitudes, it also enhances individualizing moral foundations and decreases binding moral foundations. However the evidence is mixed regarding whether abstract mind-set increases or decreases the strength of moral convictions in general. In this context the aim of this study was 2-fold. In two preregistered studies on U.S. American and Turkish samples (aggregate N = 694) we tested (1) whether abstract mind-set increases the consistency in moral convictions similar to the case of political attitudes and (2) whether inducing an abstract mind-set increases individualizing and decreases binding foundations. The results did not provide support for any of the hypotheses and the past findings were not reproduced. Potential implications of these findings for construal level theory literature are discussed.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/1948550619856309
dc.identifier.issn 1948-5506
dc.identifier.issn 1948-5514
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550619856309
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/6885
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.relation.ispartof Social Psychological and Personality Science
dc.source SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE
dc.subject abstract, concrete, construal level, moral foundations
dc.subject CONSTRUAL-LEVEL, PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE, POLITICAL CONSERVATISM, VALUES, REPLICATION, JUDGMENT, ALPHA
dc.title Does an Abstract Mind-Set Increase the Internal Consistency of Moral Attitudes and Strengthen Individualizing Foundations?
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.endpage 335
gdc.description.startpage 326
gdc.description.volume 11
gdc.identifier.openalex W2955797006
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.oaire.accesstype BRONZE
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 4.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.805959E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Alpha
gdc.oaire.keywords Construal-Level
gdc.oaire.keywords Replication
gdc.oaire.keywords Values
gdc.oaire.keywords PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Moral Behavior
gdc.oaire.keywords PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences
gdc.oaire.keywords Judgment
gdc.oaire.keywords Psychological Distance
gdc.oaire.keywords bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences
gdc.oaire.keywords bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology
gdc.oaire.keywords bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts
gdc.oaire.keywords PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology
gdc.oaire.keywords Political Conservatism
gdc.oaire.popularity 5.7146883E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.924
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.76
gdc.opencitations.count 10
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 9
gdc.plumx.mendeley 30
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 9
oaire.citation.endPage 335
oaire.citation.startPage 326
person.identifier.orcid Yilmaz- Onurcan/0000-0002-6094-7162, Alper- Sinan/0000-0002-9051-0690
publicationissue.issueNumber 3
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 11
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files