Exergoeconomic analysis and performance assessment of hydrogen and power production using different gasification systems

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2012

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

In this paper we investigate three different gasifiers for hydrogen production namely downdraft gasifier (DG) circulating fluidized bed gasifier (CFBG) and plasma gasifier (PG) as taken from the literature under Cases 1-3 respectively. These cases are then modified for cogeneration of hydrogen and power. We use the specific exergy cost (SPECO) method to calculate exergy-related parameters and display cost flows for all streams and components. The case studies are selected from different countries. We study how flow rates of streams cost and hydrogen unit costs change if these facilities operate in Turkey. The process life time is considered 15 years and the inflation rate and energy inflation rate are taken from the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey as 8.91% and 19.25% while unit energy water and biomass costs are taken 31.38 $/GJ 4.59 $/t and 35.42 $/t for Turkey respectively. The electric power requirements are calculated to be 0.0915 12.53 and 23.26 MW <inf>e</inf> for DG CFBG and PG respectively. In Cases 1-3 the electric power generated by the systems are 0.144 MW 1.17 MW and 3.88 MW respectively and may be sold to the national grid with cost rates of 31.8 $/h 258.39 $/h and 856.88 $/h. In the systems the hydrogen production rates and costs per unit mass are obtained to be 0.004 kg/s 0.521 kg/s and 0.155 kg/s and 1.16 $/kg 3.33 $/kg and 2.45 $/kg for the DG the CFBG and the PG respectively. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Circulating Fluidized Bed Gasification, Downdraft Gasification, Energy, Hydrogen Production, Plasma Gasification, Central Bank, Circulating Fluidized Bed, Cost Flow, Cost Rates, Downdraft Gasification, Electric Power, Electric Power Requirement, Energy, Exergoeconomic Analysis, Gasifiers, Hydrogen Production Rate, Inflation Rates, Life-times, National Grid, Per Unit, Performance Assessment, Plasma Gasification, Power Production, Specific Exergy, Unit Cost, Cost Accounting, Exergy, Gasification, Hydrogen, Hydrogen Production, Costs, Central bank, Circulating fluidized bed, Cost flow, Cost rates, Downdraft gasification, Electric power, Electric power requirement, Energy, Exergoeconomic analysis, Gasifiers, Hydrogen production rate, Inflation rates, Life-times, National Grid, Per unit, Performance assessment, Plasma gasification, Power production, Specific exergy, Unit cost, Cost accounting, Exergy, Gasification, Hydrogen, Hydrogen production, Costs, Downdraft Gasification, Hydrogen Production, Circulating Fluidized Bed Gasification, Plasma Gasification, Energy

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
29

Source

Fuel

Volume

102

Issue

Start Page

187

End Page

198
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 9

Scopus : 32

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 72

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.4131

Sustainable Development Goals