Lean in higher education: A proposed model for lean transformation in a business school with MCDM application

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2019

Authors

Yigit Kazancoglu
Yeşim Deniz Özkan-Özen

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Purpose: This research aims to investigate and define the eight wastes of lean philosophy in higher education institutions (HEIs) by proposing a multi-stage model. Design/methodology/approach: The authors have used a specific multi-criteria decision-making method fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory to investigate the cause–effect relationships and importance order between criteria for wastes in HEIs. In total 22 criteria were categorized under eight wastes of lean. The study was implemented in a business school with the participation of faculty members from different departments. Findings: The results showed that the most important wastes in the business school selected were repeated tasks unnecessary bureaucracy errors because of misunderstanding/communication problems excessive number of academic units and creation of an excessive amount of information. Another important result was that all the sub-wastes of talent were in the causes group while motion and transportation wastes were in the effect group. Practical implications: A road map to guide lean transformation for HEIs is proposed with a multi-stage model and potential areas for improvement in HEIs were presented. Originality/value: This study proposes a multi-stage structure by applying multi-criteria decision-making to HEIs focussing on wastes from a lean perspective. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Fuzzy Dematel, Higher Education, Lean, Waste, Waste, Higher Education, Lean, Fuzzy DEMATEL

Fields of Science

0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
35

Source

Quality Assurance in Education

Volume

27

Issue

1

Start Page

82

End Page

102
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 32

Scopus : 41

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 145

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
5.938

Sustainable Development Goals