Corrigendum to ‘Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges innovations and global policy impacts’ [Renew Sustain Energy Rev 216 (2025) 1–31] (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2025) 216 (S1364032125003442) (10.1016/j.rser.2025.115671))

dc.contributor.author V. M. Aishwarya
dc.contributor.author Banu Yetkin Yetkin Ekren
dc.contributor.author Tej Singh
dc.contributor.author Vedant Singh
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:48:33Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract The authors regret that an unintended discrepancy occurred during the final publication process specifically affecting Table 2. This discrepancy pertains to the references listed under the first challenge ‘Environmental impact and sustainability.’ In the published version the table included an incomplete list of references. The correct reference list should be: [11] [21–24] [25] [28−109]. This correction affects the representation of the number and percentage of studies addressing this challenge which informed part of the analysis in the literature review section. All other sections of the article remain consistent with the version reviewed and submitted by the authors. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused. © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115894
dc.identifier.issn 18790690, 13640321
dc.identifier.issn 1364-0321
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105006725767&doi=10.1016%2Fj.rser.2025.115894&partnerID=40&md5=8f9718481ec8e6d62ecbcad46e2898a8
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7976
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartof Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
dc.source Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
dc.title Corrigendum to ‘Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges innovations and global policy impacts’ [Renew Sustain Energy Rev 216 (2025) 1–31] (Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2025) 216 (S1364032125003442) (10.1016/j.rser.2025.115671))
dc.type Erratum
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article::corrigendum
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.startpage 115894
gdc.description.volume 219
gdc.identifier.openalex W4410765311
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 0.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.3811355E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.5970819E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 0.0
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.13
gdc.opencitations.count 0
gdc.plumx.mendeley 25
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 0
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Aishwarya- V. M. (59906576800), Yetkin Ekren- Banu Yetkin (23488489800), Singh- Tej (57970285600), Singh- Vedant (56033066400)
project.funder.name SC transparency and due diligence with a focus on ethical and environmental regulations are highlighted in 5 % of the papers. These policies address SC due diligence and human rights issues enacted globally and in regions like Germany and China. Additionally sustainability and transparency in battery production and recycling are practiced in the EU China Mexico Bolivia and Chile. Resource management and environmental impact policies reviewed in 2 % of the studies are supported by the DRC.R&D funding aimed at advancing new technology and innovation within the EV battery SC is covered in 16 % of the papers. Global efforts from countries such as the US China Japan and Canada are key in driving these plans. Specific funding for the EV battery SC is discussed in 5 % of the studies with China and the US playing pivotal roles in supporting these initiatives.
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 219
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files