Does ownership type affect environmental disclosure?

dc.contributor.author Ece Acar
dc.contributor.author Kiymet Tunca Caliyurt
dc.contributor.author Yasemin Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu
dc.date JUN 25
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T16:21:59Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.description.abstract Purpose In recent years firms tend to direct their attention in communicating their environmental actions with their stakeholders. However the level of environmental disclosers varies significantly among firms. This paper aims to explain the variation in environmental disclosure of firms based on their ownership type namely - state ownership and institutional ownership. The study further aims to understand whether and how the relationship between ownership structure and environmental disclosure changes regarding countries' development levels. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a sample of 27847 firm-year observations from 72 countries/economic districts between the years 2002 and 2017 and regression analysis to test how the relationship between different ownership structures and environmental disclosure and whether this relation is conditional on countries' development levels. Findings This study finds that firms with higher state ownership have higher environmental disclosures and higher institutional ownership has a negative effect on environmental disclosures. Furthermore this paper also documents that firms with higher state ownership and operating in developed countries have incrementally higher environmental disclosure relative to firms operating in developing countries. Research limitations/implications The study has limitations that would provide possible starting points for further research. The first limitation is related to the environmental disclosure measure which reflects the level of environmental disclosure of firms based on their disclosure information given in the Thomson Reuters Asset4 database. A more refined measure can be constructed using hand-collected data based on linguistic analysis which may reflect not only the level of the disclosure but also the quality of the environmental disclosure. The second limitation is the limited focus of the study toward state and institutional shareholding. Therefore future research may consider examining the different types of ownership such as family ownership. Practical implications The findings of the study may help policymakers and regulators to consider the potential impact of various ownership types on environmental disclosures. Also given the impact of countries' development levels regulators should consider that a one-size-fits-all is not applicable in environmental disclosures. Therefore each country should consider the institutional dynamics of their operating environment to set appropriate regulations to enhance environmental disclosures. Social implications From a social perspective the findings indicate that firms' stakeholder engagement via environmental disclosures depends on the type of the controlling shareholders. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by developing a new construct for environmental disclosure based on Biodiversity Climate Change Environmental Investments and Spill Impact Reduction performance measures. Further grounding on legitimacy and stakeholder theories this study shows the influence of ownership type on environmental disclosures and how this effect changes in accordance with the countries' development.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2020-0016
dc.identifier.issn 1756-8692
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-02-2020-0016
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7127
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
dc.source INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT
dc.subject Biodiversity disclosure, Climate change disclosure, Ownership type, Countries' development level
dc.subject CORPORATE-GOVERNANCE, VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE, DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES, DETERMINANTS, MANAGEMENT, MARKET, IMPACT
dc.title Does ownership type affect environmental disclosure?
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C3
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.endpage 141
gdc.description.startpage 120
gdc.description.volume 13
gdc.identifier.openalex W3135924857
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.oaire.accesstype GOLD
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 41.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.5667904E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Environmental discourses
gdc.oaire.keywords Countries' Development Level
gdc.oaire.keywords Ownership Type
gdc.oaire.keywords Ownership structure
gdc.oaire.keywords countries’ development level
gdc.oaire.keywords climate change disclosure
gdc.oaire.keywords biodiversity disclosure
gdc.oaire.keywords Environmental sciences
gdc.oaire.keywords Biodiversity Disclosure
gdc.oaire.keywords ownership type
gdc.oaire.keywords Meteorology. Climatology
gdc.oaire.keywords GE1-350
gdc.oaire.keywords Climate Change Disclosure
gdc.oaire.keywords QC851-999
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.338948E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0502 economics and business
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 10.4424
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.98
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 55
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 51
gdc.plumx.mendeley 368
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 74
oaire.citation.endPage 141
oaire.citation.startPage 120
person.identifier.orcid caliyurt- kiymet/0000-0002-4662-8878, Zengin-Karaibrahimoglu- Yasemin/0000-0003-1885-1025,
publicationissue.issueNumber 2
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 13
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files