Comparative assessment of time series and artificial intelligence models to estimate monthly streamflow: A local and external data analysis approach

dc.contributor.author Saeid Mehdizadeh
dc.contributor.author Farshad Fathian
dc.contributor.author Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari
dc.contributor.author Jan F. Adamowski
dc.date DEC
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T16:23:13Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.description.abstract River flow rates are important for water resources projects. Given this the current study explored the use of autoregressive (AR) and moving average (MA) techniques as individual time series models and compared them to the same models hybridized with an autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model to estimate monthly streamflow. In addition two artificial intelligence (AI) approaches namely multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and gene expression programming (GEP) were explored. The performance of each of these models in estimating monthly streamflow was compared based on local and external data analyses. Using the local data analysis approach streamflow data at each target station was estimated using observed streamflow at the same station. The external data analysis approach used neighboring station streamflow data to estimate streamflow data for the target station. The Beinerahe Roodbar and Pole Astaneh stations on the Sefidrood River Iran as well as the Port Elgin and Walkerton stations on the Saugeen River Canada were used as study areas. Upstream and downstream monthly streamflow time series data were used. The performance of all models was compared using three error metrics including the root mean square error mean absolute error and correlation coefficient. The results showed that the hybrid time series models (i.e. AR-ARCH and MA-ARCH) outperformed the conventional AR and MA models. A comparison of all applied models revealed that the hybrid AR-ARCH and MA-ARCH time series models performed better than the AI techniques when using a local data analysis approach. The external data analysis approach was more accurate for monthly streamflow estimation than the local data analysis approach. To conclude based on the outcomes of the AI models under the external data analysis approach nearby data can be used to estimate streamflow of a target station when the target station streamflow data are not available.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124225
dc.identifier.issn 0022-1694
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124225
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7723
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher ELSEVIER
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Hydrology
dc.source JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
dc.subject Streamflow estimation, Time series models, Artificial intelligence approaches, Sefidrood River, Saugeen River
dc.subject MONTHLY RIVER FLOW, NEURAL-NETWORK
dc.title Comparative assessment of time series and artificial intelligence models to estimate monthly streamflow: A local and external data analysis approach
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C3
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C3
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.startpage 124225
gdc.description.volume 579
gdc.identifier.openalex W2979507909
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 37.0
gdc.oaire.influence 4.7472692E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.6759175E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0208 environmental biotechnology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0207 environmental engineering
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 4.5655
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.95
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 51
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 51
gdc.plumx.mendeley 75
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 56
gdc.virtual.author Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh
person.identifier.orcid Fathian- Farshad/0000-0001-8205-3787, Safari- Mir Jafar Sadegh/0000-0003-0559-5261
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 579
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 08e59673-4869-4344-94da-1823665e239d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 08e59673-4869-4344-94da-1823665e239d
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files