A local-best harmony search algorithm with dynamic subpopulations
Loading...

Date
2010
Authors
Quan-Ke Pan
P. N. Suganthan
J. J. Liang
M. Fatih Tasgetiren
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This article presents a local-best harmony search algorithm with dynamic subpopulations (DLHS) for solving the bound-constrained continuous optimization problems. Unlike existing harmony search algorithms the DLHS algorithm divides the whole harmony memory (HM) into many small-sized sub-HMs and the evolution is performed in each sub-HM independently. To maintain the diversity of the population and to improve the accuracy of the final solution information exchange among the sub-HMs is achieved by using a periodic regrouping schedule. Furthermore a novel harmony improvisation scheme is employed to benefit from good information captured in the local best harmony vector. In addition an adaptive strategy is developed to adjust the parameters to suit the particular problems or the particular phases of search process. Extensive computational simulations and comparisons are carried out by employing a set of 16 benchmark problems from the literature. The computational results show that overall the proposed DLHS algorithm is more effective or at least competitive in finding near-optimal solutions compared with state-of-the-art harmony search variants.
Description
Keywords
harmony search, dynamic subpopulations, evolutionary algorithms, continuous optimization, HEURISTIC ALGORITHM, OPTIMIZATION, DESIGN, Harmony Search, Continuous Optimization, Dynamic Subpopulations, Evolutionary Algorithms
Fields of Science
0209 industrial biotechnology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
64
Source
Engineering Optimization
Volume
42
Issue
2
Start Page
101
End Page
117
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 47
Scopus : 72
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 30
Google Scholar™


