Excavation is Destruction Digitization: Advances in Archaeological Practice
Loading...

Date
2015
Authors
Christopher H. Roosevelt
Peter Cobb
Emanuel Moss
Brandon R. Olson
Sinan Unlusoy
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This article modifies an old archaeological adage-excavation is destruction''-to demonstrate how advances in archaeological practice suggest a new iteration: excavation is digitization.'' Digitization in a fully digital paradigm refers to practices that leverage advances in onsite image-based modeling and volumetric recording integrated databases and data sharing. Such practices were implemented in 2014 during the inaugural season of the Kaymakci Archaeological Project (KAP) in western Turkey. The KAP recording system developed from inception before excavation as a digital workflow increases accuracy and efficiency as well as simplicity and consistency. The system also encourages both practical and conceptual advances in archaeological practice. These involve benefits associated with thinking volumetrically rather than in two dimensions and a connectivity that allows for group decision-making regardless of group location. Additionally it is hoped that the system's use of almost entirely off-the-shelf'' solutions will encourage its adoption or at least its imitation by other projects.
Description
Keywords
digital culture, volumetric (3D) recording, image-based modeling, integrated spatial database management, Kaymakci Archaeological Project (Turkey), SCANNING TECHNOLOGY, MORPHOMETRIC-ANALYSIS, 3D, FIELD, SITE, PHOTOGRAMMETRY, DOCUMENTATION, RECONSTRUCTION, ISRAEL, CLASSIFICATION
Fields of Science
0601 history and archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
131
Source
Journal of Field Archaeology
Volume
40
Issue
Start Page
325
End Page
346
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 23
Scopus : 156
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 220
Google Scholar™


