Determinants of organic wine consumption behavior from the perspective of the theory of planned behavior
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose: Focusing only on the characteristics of the wine and the type of production is insufficient to give a holistic idea on consumer’s organic wine consumption behavior. Therefore this study aims to examine the impact of attitude perceived behavioral organic wine consumption theory of planned behavior (TPB) control and subjective norms on organic wine consumption intention and behavior. Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on the TPB a theoretical model was developed and tested by partial least squares structural equation modeling method. The sample of the research consists of 304 participants from the vineyards in Izmir/Turkey. Findings: The main result of this study reveals that the theoretical model belonging to the TPB is also valid in the case of organic wine consumption behavior. Specifically research results indicate that attitude has the strongest direct impact on intention and indirect impact on organic wine consumption behavior while perceived behavioral control has the least impact. Originality/value: Prediction of organic wine consumption behavior from the perspective of the TPB presents the originality of this paper. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Consumer Behavior, Organic Wine, Organic Wine Consumption, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Theory Of Planned Behavior, Wines, Theory of Planned Behavior, Organic Wine Consumption, Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, Wines, Organic Wine, Consumer Behavior
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
32
Source
International Journal of Wine Business Research
Volume
33
Issue
3
Start Page
360
End Page
376
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 31
Scopus : 38
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 107
Google Scholar™


