Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task

dc.contributor.author Filiz Gözenman
dc.contributor.author Marian E. Berryhill
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:52:09Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.description.abstract There is growing interest in non-invasive brain stimulation techniques. A drawback is that the relationship between stimulation and cognitive outcomes for various tasks are unknown. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) provides diffuse current spread whereas high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) provides more targeted current. The direction of behavioral effects after tDCS can be difficult to predict in cognitive realms such as attention and working memory (WM). Previously we showed that in low and high WM capacity groups tDCS modulates performance in nearly equal and opposite directions on a change detection task with improvement for the high capacity participants alone. Here we used the retro-cue paradigm to test attentional shifting among items in WM to investigate whether WM capacity (WMC) predicted different behavioral consequences during anodal tDCS or HD-tDCS to posterior parietal cortex (PPC). In two experiments with 24 participants each we used different stimulus categories (colored circles letters) and stimulation sites (right left PPC). The results showed a significant (Experiment 1) or trending (Experiment 2) WMC x stimulation interaction. Compared to tDCS after HD-tDCS the retro-cueing benefit was significantly greater for the low WMC group but numerically worse for the high WMC group. These data highlight the importance of considering group differences when using non-invasive neurostimulation techniques. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.056
dc.identifier.issn 18727972, 03043940
dc.identifier.issn 0304-3940
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84978240384&doi=10.1016%2Fj.neulet.2016.06.056&partnerID=40&md5=09f475bd6ba6e7d7e7b7cd26dca8be72
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/9778
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Elsevier Ireland Ltd
dc.relation.ispartof Neuroscience Letters
dc.source Neuroscience Letters
dc.subject Group Differences, Hd-tdcs, Tdcs, Working Memory, Working Memory Capacity, Accuracy, Article, Association, Attention, Clinical Article, Controlled Study, Electroencephalogram, Human, Posterior Parietal Cortex, Priority Journal, Retro Cue, Task Performance, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Working Memory, Neuropsychological Test, Parietal Lobe, Physiology, Procedures, Reproducibility, Short Term Memory, Attention, Cues, Humans, Memory Short-term, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Reproducibility Of Results, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
dc.subject accuracy, Article, association, attention, clinical article, controlled study, electroencephalogram, human, posterior parietal cortex, priority journal, retro cue, task performance, transcranial direct current stimulation, working memory, neuropsychological test, parietal lobe, physiology, procedures, reproducibility, short term memory, Attention, Cues, Humans, Memory Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Parietal Lobe, Reproducibility of Results, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
dc.title Working memory capacity differentially influences responses to tDCS and HD-tDCS in a retro-cue task
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C4
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.endpage 109
gdc.description.startpage 105
gdc.description.volume 629
gdc.identifier.openalex W2474555423
gdc.identifier.pmid 27369325
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype BRONZE
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 19.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.702983E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords Memory, Short-Term
gdc.oaire.keywords Parietal Lobe
gdc.oaire.keywords Humans
gdc.oaire.keywords Reproducibility of Results
gdc.oaire.keywords Attention
gdc.oaire.keywords Cues
gdc.oaire.keywords Neuropsychological Tests
gdc.oaire.keywords Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
gdc.oaire.popularity 2.2851593E-8
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 03 medical and health sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0302 clinical medicine
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 05 social sciences
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
gdc.openalex.collaboration International
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.412
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.92
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 52
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 18
gdc.plumx.mendeley 125
gdc.plumx.pubmedcites 29
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 49
oaire.citation.endPage 109
oaire.citation.startPage 105
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Gözenman- Filiz (56282627500), Berryhill- Marian E. (6507831281)
project.funder.name The authors declare no competing financial interests. Research reported in this manuscript was funded by NEI R15EY022775 to M. E. B and P20 GM103650 (P.I.: Michael Webster, Project Leader: M. E. B.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH NIGMS or NEI.
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 629
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files