Probabilistic evaluation of liquefaction analysis in performance based design framework
Loading...

Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Soil liquefaction during earthquakes poses a persistent challenge in geotechnical engineering particularly in translating advanced numerical simulations into reliable performance-based damage predictions. This study presents a novel framework that incorporates the maximum excess pore pressure ratio (PPR_max)—a simulation–derived yet underutilized Engineering Demand Parameter (EDP)—to directly predict liquefaction–induced damage under site–specific seismic loading conditions. Dynamic effective–stress finite element simulations were performed for soft alluvial soils in the seismically active İzmir–Karşıyaka region. Using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis PPR_max thresholds were statistically calibrated against observed damage levels to define transition points between minor and moderate damage. This calibration enabled the derivation of fragility curves linking peak ground acceleration (PGA) to probabilistic damage states within a regional hazard–consistent framework. The study further demonstrates the critical role of liquefiable layer thickness in controlling seismic pore pressure response. Even under identical ground motion intensities variations in stratigraphy produced significantly different damage outcomes—highlighting a major gap in current seismic codes which often neglect subsurface variability. The proposed framework enhances the predictive capacity of liquefaction risk assessments by bridging physics–based numerical modeling and empirical damage observations. It provides a scalable foundation for integrating simulation–compatible EDPs into performance–based seismic design and risk mitigation strategies. © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
ORCID
Keywords
Damage Severity Index, Fragility Curve, Performance–based Design, Ppr_max, Seismic Risk Assessment, Soil Liquefaction, Damage Detection, Earthquake Effects, Geotechnical Engineering, Induced Seismicity, Logistic Regression, Pore Pressure, Risk Assessment, Seismic Design, Soils, Damage Severity Index, Design Frameworks, Evaluation Of Liquefactions, Fragility Curves, Liquefaction Analysis, Performance Based Design, Ppr_max, Probabilistic Evaluation, Seismic Risk Assessment, Severity Index, Soil Liquefaction, Conceptual Framework, Geotechnical Engineering, Ground Motion, Liquefaction, Numerical Model, Performance Assessment, Pore Pressure, Risk Assessment, Seismic Design, Seismic Hazard, Stratigraphy, Damage detection, Earthquake effects, Geotechnical engineering, Induced Seismicity, Logistic regression, Pore pressure, Risk assessment, Seismic design, Soils, Damage severity index, Design frameworks, Evaluation of liquefactions, Fragility curves, Liquefaction analysis, Performance based design, PPR_max, Probabilistic evaluation, Seismic risk assessment, Severity index, Soil liquefaction, conceptual framework, geotechnical engineering, ground motion, liquefaction, numerical model, performance assessment, pore pressure, risk assessment, seismic design, seismic hazard, stratigraphy, Fragility Curve, Seismic Risk Assessment, Soil Liquefaction, Performance-Based Design, Ppr_max, Damage Severity Index, Performance–Based Design, Damage severity index, Fragility curve, Soil liquefaction, Performance-based design, PPR_max, Seismic risk assessment
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Volume
23
Issue
11
Start Page
4335
End Page
4363
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 2
Google Scholar™



