Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges innovations and global policy impacts
| dc.contributor.author | V. M. Aishwarya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Banu Yetkin Yetkin Ekren | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tej Singh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Vedant Singh | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T17:48:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the integration of sustainability practices into the circular supply chain (SC) of electric vehicle (EV) batteries to address environmental and economic challenges. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol a systematic review of 147 articles (2009–2024) identifies key challenges solutions innovations and policy measures shaping the EV battery SC. The research uncovers 10 major challenges 31 sub-challenges and 160 detailed challenges highlighting issues related to SC resilience environmental impact and economic sustainability. In response 40 main solutions and 174 complete solutions are mapped leading to the identification of 102 detailed technologies 24 sub-technologies and 8 core technologies supporting circular economy principles. These technologies are analysed for their long-term industry impact with comparisons within categories to highlight their advantages disadvantages and contributions to circular economy goals. Additionally global policy analysis reveals regulatory advancements with China and the UK leading efforts to improve recycling material recovery and sustainability governance. This study also compares EV battery policies across countries using indicators like policy coverage enforcement intensity and effectiveness highlighting their impact on sustainability and resource efficiency. A conceptual framework is developed to integrate these challenges solutions and innovations into a sustainable EV battery SC. The study concludes with theoretical insights industry recommendations and policy implications offering a structured pathway toward sustainable and resilient EV battery SCs. © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115671 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 18790690, 13640321 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1364-0321 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105001856083&doi=10.1016%2Fj.rser.2025.115671&partnerID=40&md5=9df1822320e37f33c4dbc55e59aaec02 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7993 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | |
| dc.source | Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews | |
| dc.subject | Battery Supply Chain, Circular Economy, Electric Vehicle, Recycling And Remanufacturing, Supply Chain Resilience, Battery Supply, Battery Supply Chain, Circular Economy, Electric Vehicle Batteries, Global Policies, Innovation Policies, Recycling And Remanufacturing, Supply Chain Resiliences, Sustainability Practices, Systematic Review | |
| dc.subject | Battery supply, Battery supply chain, Circular economy, Electric vehicle batteries, Global policies, Innovation policies, Recycling and remanufacturing, Supply chain resiliences, Sustainability practices, Systematic Review | |
| dc.title | Integrating sustainability across the lifecycle of electric vehicle batteries: Circular supply chain challenges innovations and global policy impacts | |
| dc.type | Review | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::review | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 115671 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 216 | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W4409196838 | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 13.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.933657E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | false | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.2004313E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 10.391 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.99 | |
| gdc.openalex.toppercent | TOP 10% | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 5 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 5 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 71 | |
| gdc.plumx.newscount | 1 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 13 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | Aishwarya- V. M. (59906576800), Yetkin Ekren- Banu Yetkin (23488489800), Singh- Tej (57970285600), Singh- Vedant (56033066400) | |
| project.funder.name | SC transparency and due diligence with a focus on ethical and environmental regulations are highlighted in 5% of the papers. These policies address SC due diligence and human rights issues enacted globally and in regions like Germany and China. Additionally sustainability and transparency in battery production and recycling are practiced in the EU China Mexico Bolivia and Chile. Resource management and environmental impact policies reviewed in 2% of the studies are supported by the DRC.R&D funding aimed at advancing new technology and innovation within the EV battery SC is covered in 16% of the papers. Global efforts from countries such as the US China Japan and Canada are key in driving these plans. Specific funding for the EV battery SC is discussed in 5% of the studies with China and the US playing pivotal roles in supporting these initiatives. | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 216 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |
