Innovation Challenges in South Asia: Evidence from Bangladesh Pakistan and India
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Fatma Nur Karaman Kabadurmus
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In literature the implications of resource constraints for innovation outcomes are conflicting. A broad body of empirical research focuses on the negative impacts of such constraints most of which use data from advanced economies. However recently some scholars argue that in emerging economies innovation occurs in spite of and even because of the poor investment environment. Using firm-level data from South Asia which provides a good natural example for such poor investment environment and where innovation tigers like India continue to thrive we investigate whether internal barriers such as lack of human capital and financial capital are indeed barriers for firms in the region. Our findings for India provide empirical support for the literature on resource-constrained innovation while results for Pakistan support earlier contributions within the conventional innovation literature. For Bangladesh however neither human nor financial resources but firm-characteristics such as size and foreign ownership promote innovation more. Findings are validated across sub-samples of small and medium-sized enterprises and non-exporters which are more likely to face such constraints.
Description
Keywords
Innovation, South Asia, scarcity, Enterprise Surveys, BINARY CHOICE MODELS, OF-THE-ART, EMERGING MARKETS, REVERSE INNOVATION, FRUGAL INNOVATION, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS, RADICAL INNOVATION, TECHNOLOGY, EXPLORATION, Innovation, South Asia, Enterprise Surveys, Scarcity
Fields of Science
0502 economics and business, 05 social sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
10
Source
Journal of South Asian Development
Volume
16
Issue
1
Start Page
100
End Page
129
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 11
Scopus : 14
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 49
Google Scholar™


