Probabilistic assessment of soil liquefaction-induced failures during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Türkiye: A case study from Iskenderun city

dc.contributor.author Şahin Çaǧlar Tuna
dc.contributor.author Tuna, Şahin Çağlar
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:48:32Z
dc.date.issued 2025
dc.description.abstract The February 6 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes and their aftershocks caused devastating destruction across Türkiye and Syria. Widespread liquefaction-induced damage—particularly in regions such as Iskenderun Adıyaman-Gölbaşı Hatay-Dörtyol and Reyhanlı—was reported along with general structural damage throughout the affected areas. This study addresses the critical issue of soil liquefaction within a probabilistic earthquake–soil–structure interaction framework and provides a comprehensive assessment of its impacts. An empirical methodology is proposed for estimating liquefaction-induced settlements near buildings by integrating post-earthquake reconnaissance observations with analytical results within a Performance-Based Design (PBD) framework. The analysis focuses on three regions within the Iskenderun district which were selected based on observed evidence of liquefaction and underlying geotechnical characteristics. Geotechnical investigation reports and recorded ground motion data were employed to evaluate the influence of local soil conditions. Site effects were evaluated using one-dimensional site response analyses which allowed for the simulation of ground motion amplification. The resulting surface acceleration time histories served as the basis for the damage assessment. To quantify liquefaction susceptibility a data-driven classification of the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) was conducted using K-Means clustering facilitating the derivation of optimized thresholds for damage severity. Based on this classification empirical fragility functions were developed to relate the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) to the Damage Severity Index (DSI) enabling the estimation of exceedance probabilities for different damage states. The findings highlight the importance of probabilistic fragility modeling in enhancing seismic hazard mitigation strategies and informing risk-based engineering decisions. © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorship North Anatolian Fault Zone; East Anatolian Fault Zone; Arabian and Eurasian plates; Dead Sea Fault System
dc.description.sponsorship The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) is characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion, whereas the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) exhibits left-lateral strike-slip behavior. Together, these fault systems accommodate the westward tectonic escape of the Anatolian Plate, driven by the convergence of the Arabian and Eurasian plates. While earlier geodetic estimates suggested an average slip rate of approximately 21 mm/year, recent GPS measurements reveal spatial variability in slip rates across different segments of the fault system. Furthermore, paleomagnetic data support a diachronous initiation of the NAFZ and EAFZ, consistent with a two-phase deformation process spanning from the late Miocene to the early Pliocene (Cengiz & Karabulut, 2024). This dynamic plate interaction gives rise to a complex deformation regime characterized by subduction, normal faulting, reverse faulting, and strike-slip mechanisms, accompanied by both compressional and extensional structures [57]. The Mw 7.7 earthquake of February 6, 2023, ruptured a segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ), producing approximately 350 km of surface rupture. Together with its aftershocks, the earthquake sequence occurred within the tectonic transition zone between the Dead Sea Fault System and the East Anatolian Fault Zone [58]. Fig. 3 presents the spatial distribution of these events, along with historical earthquakes that have occurred along the same fault system.This observed trend is in good agreement with the empirical model proposed by Andrus and Stokoe [79]. Data points from all three regions largely conform to the expected correlation, indicating strong consistency between geotechnical and geophysical indicators. A few outliers—particularly in Region 3—are likely attributed to the presence of denser or gravel-rich soil layers, where SPT blow counts may be relatively elevated compared to shear wave velocity (Vs) values. Overall, the coherence between SPT and Vs datasets substantiates the quality of the adopted field data and supports their integrated use in performance-based liquefaction potential assessments. Based on the geotechnical characterization and spatial distribution of observed damage, a curated subset of 43 liquefaction-induced structural damage cases was extracted from a broader dataset encompassing both earthquake events and all affected regions (Table 6). These cases represent a focused subset selected to highlight representative damage patterns and underlying trends, thereby ensuring analytical clarity and consistency across the study. Fig. 14 presents the spatial distribution of the selected damage points, each linked to a corresponding Damage Severity Index (DSI) value. To enhance regional interpretation of liquefaction susceptibility and support subsequent fragility analyses, a smoothly interpolated surface was generated.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109661
dc.identifier.issn 02677261
dc.identifier.issn 0267-7261
dc.identifier.issn 1879-341X
dc.identifier.scopus 2-s2.0-105010674246
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105010674246&doi=10.1016%2Fj.soildyn.2025.109661&partnerID=40&md5=75305ad79c78799834060868d27fc760
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7961
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109661
dc.language.iso English
dc.publisher Elsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartof Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.source Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
dc.subject 2023 Kahramanmaras Earthquakes, Damage Index, Fragility Function, Liquefaction, Performance Based Design, Site Response Analysis, Earthquake Effects, Failure (mechanical), K-means Clustering, Risk Perception, Seismic Design, Seismic Response, Soil Structure Interactions, Soils, Structural Analysis, 2023 Kahramanmara Earthquake, Case-studies, Damage Index, Fragility Function, Liquefaction Potential Index, Liquefaction-induced Damage, Performance Based Design, Probabilistic Assessments, Probabilistics, Site Response Analysis, Damage Detection, Soil Liquefaction, Aftershock, Earthquake Event, Empirical Analysis, Liquefaction, Soil-structure Interaction, Hatay, Iskenderun, Turkey
dc.subject Earthquake effects, Failure (mechanical), K-means clustering, Risk perception, Seismic design, Seismic response, Soil structure interactions, Soils, Structural analysis, 2023 kahramanmara earthquake, Case-studies, Damage index, Fragility function, Liquefaction potential index, Liquefaction-induced damage, Performance based design, Probabilistic assessments, Probabilistics, Site response analysis, Damage detection, Soil liquefaction, aftershock, earthquake event, empirical analysis, liquefaction, soil-structure interaction, Hatay, Iskenderun, Turkey
dc.subject Performance Based Design
dc.subject Liquefaction
dc.subject 2023 Kahramanmaras Earthquakes
dc.subject Damage Index
dc.subject Fragility Function
dc.subject Site Response Analysis
dc.title Probabilistic assessment of soil liquefaction-induced failures during the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes in Türkiye: A case study from Iskenderun city
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.author.institutional Tuna, Şahin Çağlar (55341153100)
gdc.author.scopusid 55341153100
gdc.author.wosid Tuna, Şahin çağlar/ACZ-1479-2022
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C5
gdc.bip.popularityclass C5
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.department
gdc.description.departmenttemp [Tuna, Sahin Caglar] Yasar Univ, Civil Engn Dept, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkiye
gdc.description.publicationcategory Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
gdc.description.startpage 109661
gdc.description.volume 199
gdc.description.woscitationindex Science Citation Index Expanded
gdc.identifier.openalex W4412966940
gdc.identifier.wos WOS:001548160600001
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.index.type WoS
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.impulse 1.0
gdc.oaire.influence 2.413684E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen false
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.3195342E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 1.0261
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.78
gdc.opencitations.count 1
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 1
gdc.plumx.mendeley 9
gdc.plumx.newscount 1
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 2
gdc.scopus.citedcount 2
gdc.virtual.author Tuna, Şahin Çağlar
gdc.wos.citedcount 2
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Tuna- Şahin Çaǧlar (55341153100)
project.funder.name The North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) is characterized by right-lateral strike-slip motion whereas the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) exhibits left-lateral strike-slip behavior. Together these fault systems accommodate the westward tectonic escape of the Anatolian Plate driven by the convergence of the Arabian and Eurasian plates. While earlier geodetic estimates suggested an average slip rate of approximately 21 mm/year recent GPS measurements reveal spatial variability in slip rates across different segments of the fault system. Furthermore paleomagnetic data support a diachronous initiation of the NAFZ and EAFZ consistent with a two-phase deformation process spanning from the late Miocene to the early Pliocene (Cengiz & Karabulut 2024). This dynamic plate interaction gives rise to a complex deformation regime characterized by subduction normal faulting reverse faulting and strike-slip mechanisms accompanied by both compressional and extensional structures [57]. The Mw 7.7 earthquake of February 6 2023 ruptured a segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) producing approximately 350 km of surface rupture. Together with its aftershocks the earthquake sequence occurred within the tectonic transition zone between the Dead Sea Fault System and the East Anatolian Fault Zone [58]. Fig. 3 presents the spatial distribution of these events along with historical earthquakes that have occurred along the same fault system.This observed trend is in good agreement with the empirical model proposed by Andrus and Stokoe [79]. Data points from all three regions largely conform to the expected correlation indicating strong consistency between geotechnical and geophysical indicators. A few outliers\u2014particularly in Region 3\u2014are likely attributed to the presence of denser or gravel-rich soil layers where SPT blow counts may be relatively elevated compared to shear wave velocity (Vs) values. Overall the coherence between SPT and Vs datasets substantiates the quality of the adopted field data and supports their integrated use in performance-based liquefaction potential assessments. Based on the geotechnical characterization and spatial distribution of observed damage a curated subset of 43 liquefaction-induced structural damage cases was extracted from a broader dataset encompassing both earthquake events and all affected regions (Table 6). These cases represent a focused subset selected to highlight representative damage patterns and underlying trends thereby ensuring analytical clarity and consistency across the study. Fig. 14 presents the spatial distribution of the selected damage points each linked to a corresponding Damage Severity Index (DSI) value. To enhance regional interpretation of liquefaction susceptibility and support subsequent fragility analyses a smoothly interpolated surface was generated.
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 199
relation.isAuthorOfPublication 23905ed5-2a22-4e38-a659-19526562c12b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery 23905ed5-2a22-4e38-a659-19526562c12b
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files