Economic impact assessment of Turkey's post-Kyoto vision on emission trading

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2013

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD

Open Access Color

BRONZE

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

2

OpenAIRE Views

2

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

For the post-Kyoto period Turkey strongly emphasizes the establishment of national emission trading system by 2015 and its integration with the EU ETS along its accession process to the EU. In this paper we study the mechanisms of adjustment and economic welfare consequences of various ETS regimes that Turkey considers to apply by 2020 i.e. regional ETS and international trading within the EU ETS. We conduct our analysis under the current EU 20-20-20 emission target 20% and also under its revised version 30%. We find that Turkey has economic gains from linking with the EU ETS under the 20% cap in comparison to the domestic ETSs. Despite the EU's welfare loss under linkage in comparison to the case where Turkey has domestic abatement efforts it still prefers linking as it increases economic well being compared to the case where Turkey does not abate. Under 30% cutback Turkey has critical output loss under linkage due to high abatement burden on the EU while the EU is better off as it passes some of its abatement burden to Turkey. Therefore emission quotas and their allocation across the ETS and non ETS sectors become highly critical in distributing the overall economic gains from bilateral trading. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Climate mitigation policies, Emission trading systems, Applied general equilibrium modeling, POLICY, Climate Mitigation Policies, Emission Trading Systems, Applied General Equilibrium Modeling, economic impact, emissions trading, Turkey, Economic impacts, Economic welfare, mitigation, environmental policy, Emission trading systems, European Union, Gas emissions, Climate mitigation policies, Emission targets, general equilibrium analysis, Commerce, Bilateral trading, Cost accounting, Kyoto Protocol, General equilibrium, assessment method, Emission trading, Applied general equilibrium modeling, Climate mitigations

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
12

Source

Energy Policy

Volume

60

Issue

Start Page

764

End Page

774
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 6

Scopus : 12

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 45

SCOPUS™ Citations

12

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

12

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
3.4503

Sustainable Development Goals

REDUCED INEQUALITIES10
REDUCED INEQUALITIES
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS17
PARTNERSHIPS FOR THE GOALS