On the Contribution of Tenniel’s Illustrations to the Reading of the Alice Books

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2020

Authors

Ahmet Süner

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer editorial@springerplus.com

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

While John Tenniel’s illustrations to Lewis Carroll’s Alice books are nearly as famous as the books themselves the question of whether these illustrations contribute to or compromise the effects produced by the written text has rarely been explored. In this paper it is argued that the status of the illustrations is problematic unless the actual process of reading is taken into account. However humorous strange or witty they may appear on paper Carroll’s words ultimately depend on the reader’s interest to achieve their desired effects fully. Words alone may prove to be insufficient to achieve the sense of nonsense within the vicissitudes of a temporal reading. Focusing on several of John Tenniel’s illustrations which attempt to draw out the impossible references and the strangely humanized animals of Carroll’s text this article shows that Tenniel’s illustrations often reinforce the effect of nonsense that might remain buried in a perfunctory reading or without them might not be generated at all. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Carroll, Illustration, Nonsense, Reading, Reference, Tenniel

Fields of Science

0602 languages and literature, 05 social sciences, 06 humanities and the arts, 0503 education

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Children's Literature in Education

Volume

51

Issue

Start Page

41

End Page

62
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 1

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 14

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals