On the Contribution of Tenniel’s Illustrations to the Reading of the Alice Books
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Ahmet Süner
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer editorial@springerplus.com
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
While John Tenniel’s illustrations to Lewis Carroll’s Alice books are nearly as famous as the books themselves the question of whether these illustrations contribute to or compromise the effects produced by the written text has rarely been explored. In this paper it is argued that the status of the illustrations is problematic unless the actual process of reading is taken into account. However humorous strange or witty they may appear on paper Carroll’s words ultimately depend on the reader’s interest to achieve their desired effects fully. Words alone may prove to be insufficient to achieve the sense of nonsense within the vicissitudes of a temporal reading. Focusing on several of John Tenniel’s illustrations which attempt to draw out the impossible references and the strangely humanized animals of Carroll’s text this article shows that Tenniel’s illustrations often reinforce the effect of nonsense that might remain buried in a perfunctory reading or without them might not be generated at all. © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Carroll, Illustration, Nonsense, Reading, Reference, Tenniel
Fields of Science
0602 languages and literature, 05 social sciences, 06 humanities and the arts, 0503 education
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Children's Literature in Education
Volume
51
Issue
Start Page
41
End Page
62
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 14
Google Scholar™


