Exergoeconomic sustainability and environmental damage cost analyses of T56 turboprop engine

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2014

Authors

Ozgur Balli
A. Hepbasli

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier Ltd

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

Yes

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 1%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to assess the performance of T56 turboprop engine using the exergoeconomic sustainability and environmental damage cost analysis methods at different power loadings. The unit exergy cost of the shaft power decreases from 76.34 $/GJ at 75%-mode to 58.32 $/GJ at Takeoff-mode due to increasing the shaft power. The unit exergy cost of the kinetic exergy increases 599.43 $/GJ at 75%-mode to 666.76 $/GJ at Takeoff-mode because of the unit exergy cost of the exhaust gaseous with the increase in the fuel flow. The sustainability analysis indicates that the gas turbine has the highest sustainability index. Increasing the fuel flow rate raises the environmental pollutants and the environmental damage cost rate. The environmental damage cost rates of the engine are calculated to be 423.94 $/h at 75%-mode 576.97 $/h at 100%-mode 634.93 $/h at military-mode and 665.85 $/h at Takeoff-mode. The total cost rate consists of the sum of the fuel cost the capital investment cost the operating and maintenance costs and the environmental damage cost. The total cost rates of the engine are determined to be 1702.59 $/h at 75%-mode 2100.26 $/h at 100%-mode 2220.42 $/h at military-mode and 2284.50 $/h at Takeoff-mode. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Environmental Damage Cost Analysis, Exergoeconomic Analysis, Sustainability Analysis, Total Cost Rate, Turboprop Engine, Cost Accounting, Costs, Engines, Exergy, Investments, Sustainable Development, Takeoff, Turboprop Engines, Fuels, Gas Turbines, Maintenance, Capital Investment, Cost Rates, Environmental Damage, Environmental Pollutants, Exergoeconomic Analysis, Maintenance Cost, Sustainability Analysis, Sustainability Index, Cost Benefit Analysis, Cost-benefit Analysis, Engine, Exergy, Exhaust Emission, Flow Pattern, Maintenance, Performance Assessment, Sustainability, Investment, Kinetic Energy, Turbine, Cost accounting, Costs, Engines, Exergy, Investments, Sustainable development, Takeoff, Turboprop engines, Fuels, Gas turbines, Maintenance, Capital investment, Cost rates, Environmental damage, Environmental pollutants, Exergoeconomic analysis, Maintenance cost, Sustainability analysis, Sustainability index, Cost benefit analysis, cost-benefit analysis, engine, exergy, exhaust emission, flow pattern, maintenance, performance assessment, sustainability, investment, kinetic energy, turbine, Environmental Damage Cost Analysis, Total Cost Rate, Exergoeconomic Analysis, Turboprop Engine, Sustainability Analysis

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
93

Source

Energy

Volume

64

Issue

Start Page

582

End Page

600
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 24

Scopus : 104

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 62

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
6.6268

Sustainable Development Goals