Sediment transport modeling in non-deposition with clean bed condition using different tree-based algorithms
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Enes Gul
Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari
Ali Torabi Haghighi
Ali Danandeh Mehr
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
To reduce the problem of sedimentation in open channels calculating flow velocity is critical. Undesirable operating costs arise due to sedimentation problems. To overcome these problems the development of machine learning based models may provide reliable results. Recently numerous studies have been conducted to model sediment transport in non-deposition condition however the main deficiency of the existing studies is utilization of a limited range of data in model development. To tackle this drawback six data sets with wide ranges of pipe size volumetric sediment concentration channel bed slope sediment size and flow depth are used for the model development in this study. Moreover two tree-based algorithms namely M5 rule tree (M5RT) and M5 regression tree (M5RGT) are implemented and results are compared to the traditional regression equations available in the literature. The results show that machine learning approaches outperform traditional regression models. The tree-based algorithms M5RT and M5RGT provided satisfactory results in contrast to their regression-based alternatives with RMSE = 1.1 84 and RMSE = 1.071 respectively. In order to recommend a practical solution the tree structure algorithms are supplied to compute sediment transport in an open channel flow.
Description
Keywords
DESIGN CRITERIA, SEWER DESIGN, PREDICTION, LIMIT, CHANNELS, Geologic Sediments, Science, Q, Decision Trees, R, Models, Theoretical, Machine Learning, Medicine, Algorithms, Research Article
Fields of Science
0207 environmental engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
7
Source
PLOS ONE
Volume
16
Issue
10
Start Page
e0258125
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 9
PubMed : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 19
SCOPUS™ Citations
9
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
7
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Google Scholar™


