The impact of geopolitical risk institutional governance and green finance on attaining net-zero carbon emission
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Ahmed Imran Hunjra
Muhammad Azam
Peter Verhoeven
Dilvin Taşkın
Jiapeng Dai
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academic Press
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This research investigates the impact of geopolitical risk institutional governance and green finance on environmental outcomes specifically focusing on carbon emissions and ecological footprint. Utilizing the dynamic CS-ARDL method and aggregated mean group analysis on a panel dataset covering 21 nations from 2000 to 2021 our findings reveal that heightened geopolitical risk leads to both short and long run increases in carbon emissions and the ecological footprint. Our study finds both a direct as well as indirect connection between governance green finance and environmental outcomes in both the short and long run highlighting the nuanced impact of governance on the formulation of environmental policies and regulatory frameworks. The results emphasize the need for targeted strategies including focused investments and incentives for sustainable finance particularly in conflict-affected regions. Furthermore our research underscores the enduring impact of historical events such as wars on contemporary environmental indicators emphasizing the importance of proactive conflict prevention measures. Our research suggests that policymakers should adopt comprehensive strategies that prioritize emission reduction during short-run spikes in geopolitical risk while maintaining a steadfast commitment to long-run sustainability. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Carbon Emissions, Ecological Footprint, Geopolitical Risk, Green Finance, Institutional Governance, Tragedy Of The Common's Theory, Carbon, Carbon Footprint, Emission Control, Environmental Protection, Investments, Sustainable Development, Carbon Emissions, Ecological Footprint, Environmental Outcome, Geopolitical Risks, Green Finance, Institutional Governance, Longest Run, Short Runs, Tragedy Of The Common Theory, Tragedy Of The Commons, Risk Assessment, Carbon Emission, Data Set, Ecological Footprint, Emission Control, Environmental Indicator, Environmental Policy, Green Economy, Article, Finance, Human, Investment, Prevention, War, Environmental Protection, Politics, Carbon, Carbon, Conservation Of Natural Resources, Environmental Policy, Politics, Carbon footprint, Emission control, Environmental protection, Investments, Sustainable development, Carbon emissions, Ecological footprint, Environmental outcome, Geopolitical risks, Green finance, Institutional governance, Longest run, Short runs, Tragedy of the common theory, Tragedy of the commons, Risk assessment, carbon emission, data set, ecological footprint, emission control, environmental indicator, environmental policy, green economy, article, finance, human, investment, prevention, war, environmental protection, politics, carbon, Carbon, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Policy, Politics, Conservation of Natural Resources, Green finance, Tragedy of the common's theory, Geopolitical risk, Politics, Ecological footprint, Institutional governance, 940, Carbon, Carbon emissions, Environmental Policy
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
63
Source
Journal of Environmental Management
Volume
359
Issue
Start Page
120927
End Page
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 46
Scopus : 76
PubMed : 1
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 110
Google Scholar™


