Economic impact assessment of Turkey's post-Kyoto vision on emission trading

dc.contributor.author Gökçe Akın-Olçum
dc.contributor.author A. Erinç YELDAN
dc.date.accessioned 2025-10-06T17:52:45Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.description.abstract For the post-Kyoto period Turkey strongly emphasizes the establishment of national emission trading system by 2015 and its integration with the EU ETS along its accession process to the EU. In this paper we study the mechanisms of adjustment and economic welfare consequences of various ETS regimes that Turkey considers to apply by 2020 i.e. regional ETS and international trading within the EU ETS. We conduct our analysis under the current EU 20-20-20 emission target 20% and also under its revised version 30%. We find that Turkey has economic gains from linking with the EU ETS under the 20% cap in comparison to the domestic ETSs. Despite the EU's welfare loss under linkage in comparison to the case where Turkey has domestic abatement efforts it still prefers linking as it increases economic well being compared to the case where Turkey does not abate. Under 30% cutback Turkey has critical output loss under linkage due to high abatement burden on the EU while the EU is better off as it passes some of its abatement burden to Turkey. Therefore emission quotas and their allocation across the ETS and non ETS sectors become highly critical in distributing the overall economic gains from bilateral trading. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.018
dc.identifier.issn 03014215
dc.identifier.issn 0301-4215
dc.identifier.uri https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84880331544&doi=10.1016%2Fj.enpol.2013.05.018&partnerID=40&md5=b512170f7371ee5e7bde51465ffe2a09
dc.identifier.uri https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10087
dc.language.iso English
dc.relation.ispartof Energy Policy
dc.source Energy Policy
dc.subject Applied General Equilibrium Modeling, Climate Mitigation Policies, Emission Trading Systems, Bilateral Trading, Climate Mitigations, Economic Impacts, Economic Welfare, Emission Targets, Emission Trading, Emission Trading Systems, General Equilibrium, Cost Accounting, Gas Emissions, Commerce, Assessment Method, Economic Impact, Emissions Trading, Environmental Policy, European Union, General Equilibrium Analysis, Kyoto Protocol, Mitigation, Turkey
dc.subject Bilateral trading, Climate mitigations, Economic impacts, Economic welfare, Emission targets, Emission trading, Emission trading systems, General equilibrium, Cost accounting, Gas emissions, Commerce, assessment method, economic impact, emissions trading, environmental policy, European Union, general equilibrium analysis, Kyoto Protocol, mitigation, Turkey
dc.title Economic impact assessment of Turkey's post-Kyoto vision on emission trading
dc.type Article
dspace.entity.type Publication
gdc.bip.impulseclass C5
gdc.bip.influenceclass C4
gdc.bip.popularityclass C4
gdc.coar.type text::journal::journal article
gdc.collaboration.industrial false
gdc.description.endpage 774
gdc.description.startpage 764
gdc.description.volume 60
gdc.identifier.openalex W2004293804
gdc.index.type Scopus
gdc.oaire.accesstype BRONZE
gdc.oaire.diamondjournal false
gdc.oaire.downloads 2
gdc.oaire.impulse 3.0
gdc.oaire.influence 3.523999E-9
gdc.oaire.isgreen true
gdc.oaire.keywords economic impact
gdc.oaire.keywords emissions trading
gdc.oaire.keywords Turkey
gdc.oaire.keywords Economic impacts
gdc.oaire.keywords Economic welfare
gdc.oaire.keywords mitigation
gdc.oaire.keywords environmental policy
gdc.oaire.keywords Emission trading systems
gdc.oaire.keywords European Union
gdc.oaire.keywords Gas emissions
gdc.oaire.keywords Climate mitigation policies
gdc.oaire.keywords Emission targets
gdc.oaire.keywords general equilibrium analysis
gdc.oaire.keywords Commerce
gdc.oaire.keywords Bilateral trading
gdc.oaire.keywords Cost accounting
gdc.oaire.keywords Kyoto Protocol
gdc.oaire.keywords General equilibrium
gdc.oaire.keywords assessment method
gdc.oaire.keywords Emission trading
gdc.oaire.keywords Applied general equilibrium modeling
gdc.oaire.keywords Climate mitigations
gdc.oaire.popularity 3.922613E-9
gdc.oaire.publicfunded false
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0211 other engineering and technologies
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 02 engineering and technology
gdc.oaire.sciencefields 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
gdc.oaire.views 2
gdc.openalex.collaboration National
gdc.openalex.fwci 3.4503
gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile 0.94
gdc.openalex.toppercent TOP 10%
gdc.opencitations.count 12
gdc.plumx.crossrefcites 6
gdc.plumx.mendeley 45
gdc.plumx.scopuscites 12
oaire.citation.endPage 774
oaire.citation.startPage 764
person.identifier.scopus-author-id Akın-Olçum- Gökçe (55747063500), YELDAN- A. Erinç (6602826996)
project.funder.name We benefited from valuable comments and suggestions from Ebru Voyvoda Selin Sayek Böke Çağrı Sağlam and participants of the macroeconomic workshops at Bilkent. We also acknowledge the very careful and diligent critical comments of the two unanimous referees of this Journal. Gökçe Akın Olçum would further like to thank Christoph Böhringer for his invaluable guidance on economic modeling techniques and gratefully acknowledges the support of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for their Graduate Fellowship Program.
publicationvolume.volumeNumber 60
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37
relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37

Files