A methodology to determine appropriate facade aperture sizes considering comfort and performance criteria: A primary school classroom case

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2022

Authors

Yigit Yilmaz
Kenan Eren Sansal
Mine Ascigil-Dincer
Sinem Kultur
Sezin Hatice Tanriover

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

School environments have a profound effect on pupils. The building envelope particularly the facade has a significant role in determining thermal visual acoustic comfort energy usage and life-cycle cost as it regulates the relationship between the exterior and the interior. Nonetheless there is a lack of a multi-perspective approach in the literature assessing the facade as the key feature for achieving the comfort and performance criteria. Therefore this paper aims at proposing a methodology to determine appropriate facade aperture sizes through examining a primary school classroom case. For the comfort and performance analyses a typical Turkish primary school classroom was modelled. The aperture size was assumed to vary for the window to wall ratio from 28.54% to 71.34% with seven options. Analysis results revealed that aperture orientation was more important than its size. The smallest aperture was found to be better for visual acoustic and thermal comfort. The heating setback strategy appeared to be an effective parameter for thermal comfort as much as the aperture size. A multi-criteria decision-making method modified weighted sum model was used to assess the results to decide on the appropriate option and also present a methodology that can be used in different cases.

Description

Keywords

facade design, thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, energy efficiency, life-cycle cost, multi-criteria decision-making, INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALITY, THERMAL COMFORT, ENERGY-CONSUMPTION, VISUAL COMFORT, DESIGN, OPTIMIZATION, COST, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Acoustic Comfort, Energy Efficiency, Façade Design, Visual Comfort, Thermal Comfort, Life-Cycle Cost

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
12

Source

Indoor and Built Environment

Volume

31

Issue

7

Start Page

1874

End Page

1891
PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 10

Scopus : 13

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 37

SCOPUS™ Citations

13

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Web of Science™ Citations

12

checked on Apr 09, 2026

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
1.3759

Sustainable Development Goals

QUALITY EDUCATION4
QUALITY EDUCATION
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY7
AFFORDABLE AND CLEAN ENERGY