A methodology to determine appropriate facade aperture sizes considering comfort and performance criteria: A primary school classroom case
Loading...

Date
2022
Authors
Yigit Yilmaz
Kenan Eren Sansal
Mine Ascigil-Dincer
Sinem Kultur
Sezin Hatice Tanriover
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
School environments have a profound effect on pupils. The building envelope particularly the facade has a significant role in determining thermal visual acoustic comfort energy usage and life-cycle cost as it regulates the relationship between the exterior and the interior. Nonetheless there is a lack of a multi-perspective approach in the literature assessing the facade as the key feature for achieving the comfort and performance criteria. Therefore this paper aims at proposing a methodology to determine appropriate facade aperture sizes through examining a primary school classroom case. For the comfort and performance analyses a typical Turkish primary school classroom was modelled. The aperture size was assumed to vary for the window to wall ratio from 28.54% to 71.34% with seven options. Analysis results revealed that aperture orientation was more important than its size. The smallest aperture was found to be better for visual acoustic and thermal comfort. The heating setback strategy appeared to be an effective parameter for thermal comfort as much as the aperture size. A multi-criteria decision-making method modified weighted sum model was used to assess the results to decide on the appropriate option and also present a methodology that can be used in different cases.
Description
Keywords
facade design, thermal comfort, visual comfort, acoustic comfort, energy efficiency, life-cycle cost, multi-criteria decision-making, INDOOR ENVIRONMENTAL-QUALITY, THERMAL COMFORT, ENERGY-CONSUMPTION, VISUAL COMFORT, DESIGN, OPTIMIZATION, COST, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making, Acoustic Comfort, Energy Efficiency, Façade Design, Visual Comfort, Thermal Comfort, Life-Cycle Cost
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
12
Source
Indoor and Built Environment
Volume
31
Issue
7
Start Page
1874
End Page
1891
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 10
Scopus : 13
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 37
SCOPUS™ Citations
13
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
12
checked on Apr 09, 2026
Google Scholar™




