Redesigning for Disassembly and Carbon Footprint Reduction: Shifting from Reinforced Concrete to Hybrid Timber-Steel Multi-Story Building

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2023

Authors

Mauricio Morales-Beltran
Pinar Engur
Omer Asim Sisman
Gizem Nur Aykar

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

MDPI

Open Access Color

GOLD

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Top 10%
Influence
Top 10%
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

To reduce carbon emissions holistic approaches to design plan and build our environment are needed. Regarding multi-story residential buildings it is well-known that (1) material choices and construction typologies play a fundamental role in the reduction of carbon footprint (2) shifting from concrete to timber will reduce significantly the carbon footprint and (3) a building designed to be disassembled will increase the potential of achieving zero-carbon emissions. However little has been said about the consequences of such shifts and decisions in terms of building architecture and structural design especially in seismic-prone regions. In this study an existing 9-story reinforced concrete (RC) multi-story residential building is redesigned with cross-laminated timber floors and glue-laminated timber frames for embodied carbon reduction purposes. Firstly the reasons behind design decisions are addressed in terms of both architecture and structure including the incorporation of specially steel concentrically braced frames for seismic-resistance. Then the outcomes of life cycle assessments and pushover analyses show that the RC residential building emits two times more carbon than the hybrid steel-timber residential building and that while the hybrid building's lateral load-capacity is less than in the RC building its deformation capacity is higher. These results highlight the relevance of considering the carbon footprint in combination with the design decisions which seems to be the key to introducing circular projects in seismic-prone areas.

Description

Keywords

embodied carbon, buildings, structural design, construction technology, architectural materials, life cycle assessment, seismic performance, Turkey, EMBODIED CARBON, SEISMIC DESIGN, CIRCULAR ECONOMY, ENERGY, LIFE, DECONSTRUCTION, CHALLENGES, embodied carbon; buildings; structural design; construction technology; architectural materials; life cycle assessment; seismic performance; Turkey

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
14

Source

Sustainability

Volume

15

Issue

Start Page

7273

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

CrossRef : 1

Scopus : 20

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 86

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
2.3194

Sustainable Development Goals

INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE9
INDUSTRY, INNOVATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES11
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND COMMUNITIES
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION12
RESPONSIBLE CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCTION
CLIMATE ACTION13
CLIMATE ACTION