Redesigning for Disassembly and Carbon Footprint Reduction: Shifting from Reinforced Concrete to Hybrid Timber–Steel Multi-Story Building
Loading...

Date
2023
Authors
Mauricio Morales-Beltran
Pınar Engûr
Ömer Asım Şişman
Gizem Nur Aykar
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Open Access Color
GOLD
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
To reduce carbon emissions holistic approaches to design plan and build our environment are needed. Regarding multi-story residential buildings it is well-known that (1) material choices and construction typologies play a fundamental role in the reduction of carbon footprint (2) shifting from concrete to timber will reduce significantly the carbon footprint and (3) a building designed to be disassembled will increase the potential of achieving zero-carbon emissions. However little has been said about the consequences of such shifts and decisions in terms of building architecture and structural design especially in seismic-prone regions. In this study an existing 9-story reinforced concrete (RC) multi-story residential building is redesigned with cross-laminated timber floors and glue-laminated timber frames for embodied carbon reduction purposes. Firstly the reasons behind design decisions are addressed in terms of both architecture and structure including the incorporation of specially steel concentrically braced frames for seismic-resistance. Then the outcomes of life cycle assessments and pushover analyses show that the RC residential building emits two times more carbon than the hybrid steel-timber residential building and that while the hybrid building’s lateral load-capacity is less than in the RC building its deformation capacity is higher. These results highlight the relevance of considering the carbon footprint in combination with the design decisions which seems to be the key to introducing circular projects in seismic-prone areas. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Architectural Materials, Buildings, Construction Technology, Embodied Carbon, Life Cycle Assessment, Seismic Performance, Structural Design, Turkey, Architectural Design, Building Construction, Carbon Footprint, Construction Material, Emission Control, Life Cycle Analysis, Multistorey Building, Reinforced Concrete, Structural Response, Waste Management, architectural design, building construction, carbon footprint, construction material, emission control, life cycle analysis, multistorey building, reinforced concrete, structural response, waste management, Architectural Materials, Turkey, Buildings, Construction Technology, Embodied Carbon, Seismic Performance, Structural Design, Life Cycle Assessment, embodied carbon; buildings; structural design; construction technology; architectural materials; life cycle assessment; seismic performance; Turkey
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
14
Source
Sustainability
Volume
15
Issue
9
Start Page
7273
End Page
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 20
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 86
SCOPUS™ Citations
20
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Web of Science™ Citations
15
checked on Apr 10, 2026
Google Scholar™






