Comparative performance and thermoeconomic analyses of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane based two hybrid systems
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to compare the two systems in terms of the thermoe-conomic and the performance. The first one is called hybrid I and consists of high tem-perature polymer electrolyte membrane and thermocapacitive cycle. The second one is named hybrid II which is composed of high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane and thermoelectric generator. Thermocapacitive cycle and thermoelectric generator have various advantages such as generally lower cost and higher power density. So they have good potential to utilize waste heat. The performance parameters of the considered hybrid systems include power density energy efficiency exergy efficiency and exergy destruction rate. The results have shown that hybrid I is more advantageous than hybrid II. The maximum power density values for hybrid I and hybrid II are obtained to be 2536.91W and 2049.62W while their energy efficiencies are 77.4% and 76.8% respectively. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Thermocapacitive cycle, Thermoelectric generator, Fuel cell, Exergy, Energy, PEM FUEL-CELL, COMBINED HEAT, OPTIMIZATION, Thermocapacitive Cycle, Thermoelectric Generator, Fuel Cell, Exergy, Energy, Energy, Fuel cell, Thermocapacitive cycle, Exergy, Thermoelectric generator
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
11
Source
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume
46
Issue
57
Start Page
29411
End Page
29423
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 4
Scopus : 12
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
Google Scholar™


