Control in healthcare interiors: the staff’s perspective
Loading...

Date
2023
Authors
Gülnur Ballice
Çiğdem Çetin
Eda Paykoç Özçelik
Zeynep Tuna Ultav
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
As two of the most stressful professions doctors and nurses work intensively in direct contact with patients. However there has been little research into their perception of and satisfaction with healthcare interiors. To fill this gap in the literature this study evaluated the working resting and dining spaces of healthcare staff in terms of control. Specifically privacy boundary and territory and environmental control were analyzed in four state hospitals as case studies. Following a literature review observations semi-structured interviews and surveys were conducted with doctors and nurses from the four hospitals in 2017. The findings showed that controlling privacy boundaries and environmental control elements like natural and artificial lighting noise and odour were important for the participants. This indicates a need to ensure privacy and boundaries more effectively through separate spaces and furniture while noise and odour should also be given more attention. © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Boundary And Territory, Control, Environmental Control, Healthcare Interiors, Healthcare Staff, Privacy, Environmental Management, Nursing, Boundary And Territory, Case-studies, Direct Contact, Environmental Control, Healthcare Interior, Healthcare Staff, Literature Reviews, Privacy, Privacy Control, Semi Structured Interviews, Hospitals, Environmental management, Nursing, Boundary and territory, Case-studies, Direct contact, Environmental control, Healthcare interior, Healthcare staff, Literature reviews, Privacy, Privacy control, Semi structured interviews, Hospitals
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
1
Source
Architectural Science Review
Volume
66
Issue
Start Page
309
End Page
321
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 2
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 8
Google Scholar™


