Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach for building decarbonization by design choices: A case study

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2024

Authors

Emin Selahattin Umdu
Nurdan H. Yildirim
Poyraz Güzel
Ebru Alakavuk
Duygu Çinar Umdu

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

John Wiley and Sons Inc

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Top 10%

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

Decarbonizing the urban environment has two significant challenges: Increasing electricity demand due to the electrification of space heating and increased renewables share in the electricity supply. The European Commission defines a new grid support mechanism for peak-shaving products in renewed Electricity Market Design. This aims to enable a new market tool to stabilize electric supply and demand. This study examines a grid-integrated thermal storage device's technical feasibility and economic performance to meet net zero building (nZEB) definitions. Alternative scenarios considering current national nZEB targets present energy market options and regulations are compared using the life cycle cost and the global warming potentials over the building lifetime. The results show that better building performance is possible even with a low investment increase of 6.7% compared to minimum building standards based on regulations. This enables older building cases to perform similarly with new building targets for Turkish National nZEB. Building electrification using heat pumps and thermal storage systems gives similar economic performances in the long term when a dynamic electricity tariff is available. Adapting the life cycle approach to decision-making in construction contracts can lead to a 50% decrease in building emissions while staying within the same construction budget. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Description

Keywords

Building Energy Efficiency, Energy Performance Of Buildings, Global Warming Potential, Life Cycle Cost, Life Cycle Emissions, Architectural Design, Budget Control, Construction, Decision Making, Electric Energy Storage, Energy Efficiency, Global Warming, Heat Storage, Investments, Life Cycle, Power Markets, Product Design, Virtual Storage, Building Energy Efficiency, Case-studies, Decarbonisation, Decarbonising, Economic Performance, Energy Performance Of Buildings, Global Warming Potential, Life Cycle Cost, Life Cycle Costing, Life Cycle Emissions, Costs, Architectural design, Budget control, Construction, Decision making, Electric energy storage, Energy efficiency, Global warming, Heat storage, Investments, Life cycle, Power markets, Product design, Virtual storage, Building energy efficiency, Case-studies, Decarbonisation, Decarbonising, Economic performance, Energy performance of buildings, Global warming potential, Life cycle cost, Life cycle costing, Life cycle emissions, Costs, Global Warming Potential, Life Cycle Emissions, Energy Performance of Buildings, Life Cycle Cost, Building Energy Efficiency

Fields of Science

0211 other engineering and technologies, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
1

Source

Energy Storage

Volume

6

Issue

3

Start Page

End Page

PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 2

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 16

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.8362

Sustainable Development Goals