A tale of two hashtags: An examination of moral content of pro- and anti-government tweets in Turkey
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
During the campaign period of the 2018 Presidential Election in Turkey there was a burst in the number of tweets posted by both pro- and anti-government Twitter users. Both sides started their own hashtags and reached a total of 2 million tweets in only one day. We analyzed the content of 186554 tweets from two opposing ideological camps to test the predictions of Moral Foundations Theory which suggests that liberals and conservatives endorse different moral foundations. We scored each side's level of emphasis on different moral foundations using the Turkish Moral Foundations Dictionary and compared the two groups. Results revealed that the supporters of the conservative government in Turkey were more likely to endorse care loyalty and authority foundations of morality as compared to those who oppose the conservative government. In addition the general moral emphasis was higher in the tweets of the pro-government group. Being one of the first studies investigating the moral content of political tweets in a non-WEIRD context the current study yields important findings regarding the external validity of the Moral Foundations Theory's predictions in different cultures. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Moral Foundations, Social Media, Turkey, Twitter, Article, External Validity, Government, Morality, Prediction, Social Media, Theoretical Study, Turkey (republic), article, external validity, government, morality, prediction, social media, theoretical study, Turkey (republic), Twitter, Social Media, Moral Foundations, Turkey
Fields of Science
05 social sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
4
Source
European Journal of Social Psychology
Volume
51
Issue
3
Start Page
585
End Page
596
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 1
Scopus : 6
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 21
Google Scholar™


