The effects of globalization on supply chain resilience: outsourcing techniques as interventionism- protectionism- and regionalization strategies
Loading...

Date
2024
Authors
Yigit Kazancoglu
Cisem Lafci
Yalcin Berberoglu
Arvind Upadhyay
Luis Rocha-Lona
Vikas Kumar
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SPRINGER
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Globalization may cause companies to broaden their customer bases operate internationally and serve more customers. However it also entails dangers including shifting circumstances disruptions and elevated prices. To address these issues outsourcing has evolved lowering outputs and service costs. To mitigate these risks businesses employ strategies such as interventionism protectionism and regionalization. By investigating and simulating the interplay of outsourcing approaches to equip businesses with supply chain resilience (SCRES) this study aims to close the knowledge gap between the existing knowledge and global supply chain (GSC) risk management practices. To choose the best alternative for our case study company we analyzed four distinct outsourcing techniques namely offshoring reshoring nearshoring and farshoring, furthermore we investigated the outsourcing elements typically taken into account to achieve resilience. The results indicated that the reshoring method would be the most promising one for this company under specific circumstances in terms of attaining resilience in the manufacturing industry.
Description
Keywords
Global supply chains, Resilience, Outsourcing strategies, Reshoring, Regionalization, MCDM, Risk management, PROVIDER SELECTION, BEST-WORST, MANAGEMENT, DISRUPTION, DYNAMICS, DESIGN, IMPACT, MODEL, 330, CAH17-01-01 - business and management (non-specific), 650
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
20
Source
Operations Management Research
Volume
17
Issue
Start Page
505
End Page
522
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 40
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 110
Google Scholar™


