Decision-making for risk evaluation: integration of prospect theory with failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA)
Loading...

Date
2020
Authors
Muhittin Sagnak
Yigit Kazancoglu
Yesim Deniz Ozkan Ozen
Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
Open Access Color
HYBRID
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the present study is to overcome some of the limitations of the FMEA method by presenting a theoretical base for considering risk evaluation into its assessment methodology and proposing an approach for its implementation. Design/methodology/approach Fuzzy AHP is used to calculate the weights of the likelihood of occurrence (O) severity (S) and difficulty of detection (D). Additionally the prospect-theory-based TODIM method was integrated with fuzzy logic. Thus fuzzy TODIM was employed to calculate the ranking of potential failure modes according to their risk priority numbers (RPNs). In order to verify the results of the study in-depth interviews were conducted with the participation of industry experts. Findings The results are very much in line with prospect theory. Therefore practitioners may apply the proposed method to FMEA. The most crucial failure mode for a firm's attention is furnace failure followed by generator failure crane failure tank failure kettle failure dryer failure and operator failure respectively. Originality/value The originality of this paper consists in integrating prospect theory with the FMEA method in order to overcome the limitations naturally inherent in the calculation of the FMEA's RPNs.
Description
Keywords
Prospect theory, Failure modes and effects analysis, Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy TODIM, Risk priority number, TOPSIS APPROACH, FUZZY, TODIM, AHP, PRIORITIZATION, SELECTION, Prospect Theory, Fuzzy TODIM, Risk Priority Number, Fuzzy AHP, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
21
Source
International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management
Volume
37
Issue
Start Page
939
End Page
956
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 23
Scopus : 28
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 86
Google Scholar™


