Clear-water scour depth prediction in long channel contractions: Application of new hybrid machine learning algorithms
| dc.contributor.author | Khabat Khosravi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari | |
| dc.contributor.author | James R. Cooper | |
| dc.contributor.author | Khosravi, Khabat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cooper, James R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-06T17:50:21Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Scour depth prediction and its prevention is one of the most important issues in channel and waterway design. However the potential for advanced machine learning (ML) algorithms to provide models of scour depth has yet to be explored. This study provides the first quantification of the predictive power of a range of standalone and hybrid machine learning models. Using previously collected scour depth data from laboratory flume experiments the performance of five types of recently developed standalone machine learning techniques - the Isotonic Regression (ISOR) Sequential Minimal Optimization (SMO) Iterative Classifier Optimizer (ICO) Locally Weighted learning (LWL) and Least Median of Squares Regression (LMS) - are assessed along with their hybrid versions with Dagging (DA) and Random Subspace (RS) algorithms. The main findings are five-fold. First the DA-ICO model had the highest prediction power. Second the hybrid models had a higher prediction power than standalone models. Third all algorithms underestimated the maximum scour depth except DA-ICO which predicted scour depth almost perfectly. Fourth scour depth was most sensitive to densimetric particle Froude number followed by the non-dimensionalized contraction width flow depth within the contraction sediment geometric standard deviation approach flow velocity and median grain size. Fifth most of the algorithms performed best when all the input parameters were involved in the building of the model. An important exception was the best performing model that required only four input parameters: densimetric particle Froude number non-dimensionalized contraction width flow depth within the contraction and sediment geometric standard deviation. Overall the results revealed that hybrid machine learning algorithms provide more accurate predictions of scour depth than empirical equations and traditional ML-algorithms. In particular the DA-ICO model not only created the most accurate predictions but also used the fewest easily and readily measured input parameters. Thus this type of model could be of real benefit to practicing engineers required to estimate maximum scour depth when designing in-channel structures. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council, NERC, (NE/S01697X/1) | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109721 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 00298018 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0029-8018 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1873-5258 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85114293320 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114293320&doi=10.1016%2Fj.oceaneng.2021.109721&partnerID=40&md5=fd5863ff860eae53090966ad6b935d46 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/8902 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109721 | |
| dc.language.iso | English | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ocean Engineering | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.source | Ocean Engineering | |
| dc.subject | Data Mining, Iterative Classifier Optimizer Algorithms, Model Calibration, Scour Depth Prediction, Bridge Piers, Classification (of Information), Data Mining, Flow Velocity, Iterative Methods, Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning, Optimization, Scour, Statistics, Hybrid Machine Learning, In-channels, Input Parameter, Iterative Classifier Optimizer Algorithm, Machine Learning Algorithms, Model Calibration, Optimizers, Power, Scour Depth, Scour Depth Prediction, Forecasting, Algorithm, Data Mining, Froude Number, Machine Learning, Optimization, Scour | |
| dc.subject | Bridge piers, Classification (of information), Data mining, Flow velocity, Iterative methods, Learning algorithms, Machine learning, Optimization, Scour, Statistics, Hybrid machine learning, In-channels, Input parameter, Iterative classifier optimizer algorithm, Machine learning algorithms, Model calibration, Optimizers, Power, Scour depth, Scour depth prediction, Forecasting, algorithm, data mining, Froude number, machine learning, optimization, scour | |
| dc.subject | Model Calibration | |
| dc.subject | Scour Depth Prediction | |
| dc.subject | Data Mining | |
| dc.subject | Iterative Classifier Optimizer Algorithms | |
| dc.title | Clear-water scour depth prediction in long channel contractions: Application of new hybrid machine learning algorithms | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
| gdc.author.id | Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh/0000-0003-0559-5261 | |
| gdc.author.id | Cooper, James/0000-0003-4957-2774 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 57189515171 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 56047228600 | |
| gdc.author.scopusid | 55471744200 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Khosravi, Khabat/M-1073-2017 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh/A-4094-2019 | |
| gdc.author.wosid | Cooper, James/A-7012-2011 | |
| gdc.bip.impulseclass | C4 | |
| gdc.bip.influenceclass | C5 | |
| gdc.bip.popularityclass | C4 | |
| gdc.coar.type | text::journal::journal article | |
| gdc.collaboration.industrial | false | |
| gdc.description.department | ||
| gdc.description.departmenttemp | [Khosravi, Khabat] Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Mashhad, Razavi Khorasan, Iran; [Khosravi, Khabat] Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA; [Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh] Yasar Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Izmir, Turkey; [Cooper, James R.] Univ Liverpool, Sch Environm Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England | |
| gdc.description.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| gdc.description.startpage | 109721 | |
| gdc.description.volume | 238 | |
| gdc.description.woscitationindex | Science Citation Index Expanded | |
| gdc.identifier.openalex | W3198726211 | |
| gdc.identifier.wos | WOS:000696788900003 | |
| gdc.index.type | Scopus | |
| gdc.index.type | WoS | |
| gdc.oaire.diamondjournal | false | |
| gdc.oaire.impulse | 11.0 | |
| gdc.oaire.influence | 2.928984E-9 | |
| gdc.oaire.isgreen | true | |
| gdc.oaire.popularity | 1.3403363E-8 | |
| gdc.oaire.publicfunded | false | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0208 environmental biotechnology | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 0207 environmental engineering | |
| gdc.oaire.sciencefields | 02 engineering and technology | |
| gdc.openalex.collaboration | International | |
| gdc.openalex.fwci | 1.8502 | |
| gdc.openalex.normalizedpercentile | 0.85 | |
| gdc.opencitations.count | 13 | |
| gdc.plumx.crossrefcites | 13 | |
| gdc.plumx.mendeley | 22 | |
| gdc.plumx.scopuscites | 17 | |
| gdc.scopus.citedcount | 17 | |
| gdc.virtual.author | Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh | |
| gdc.wos.citedcount | 15 | |
| person.identifier.scopus-author-id | Khosravi- Khabat (57189515171), Safari- Mir Jafar Sadegh (56047228600), Cooper- James R. (55471744200) | |
| publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 238 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 08e59673-4869-4344-94da-1823665e239d | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 08e59673-4869-4344-94da-1823665e239d | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 | |
| relation.isOrgUnitOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | ac5ddece-c76d-476d-ab30-e4d3029dee37 |
