Comparison of efficiencies in protectionist and liberal cabotage policies
Loading...

Date
2025
Authors
Deniz Karagoz
Mehmet Fatih Acar
Emel Aktas
Anil Aba
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
This paper focuses on cabotage which is a long-standing regulation that restricts coastal trade to domestic ships. As globalisation has grown global trade organisations have pushed for the removal of these barriers to promote a competitive market environment. In this research Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to evaluate and compare the efficiencies of countries which have protectionist and liberalised cabotage policies. To do this maritime statistics in 2022 from the World Bank database are considered for 50 different countries. We find that both protectionist and liberal policies have advantages and disadvantages but neither is inherently superior. In addition cabotage policies must be structured according to each country's conditions and a delicate balance must be established between these policies considering the dynamics of the global economy. This paper has also considered advantages and disadvantages by comparing countries that have different policies on cabotage such as the UK and T & uuml,rkiye to show how cabotage regulations generate different perspectives created by their respective maritime pasts and geopolitics. In terms of an effective and competitive maritime industry the study is one of the unique types of research that underlines the need for a cabotage strategy balanced between the liberalised and protectionist components.
Description
Keywords
Cabotage, protectionism, liberalism, maritime trade, maritime policy, market liberalization, Maritime Policy, Cabotage, Protectionism, Liberalism, Maritime Trade, Market Liberalization
Fields of Science
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A
Source
Maritime Policy & Management
Volume
53
Issue
2
Start Page
1
End Page
16
PlumX Metrics
Citations
Scopus : 0
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 7
Google Scholar™


