Comparison of efficiencies in protectionist and liberal cabotage policies

Loading...
Publication Logo

Date

2025

Authors

Deniz Karagoz
Mehmet Fatih Acar
Emel Aktas
Anil Aba

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

Open Access Color

Green Open Access

No

OpenAIRE Downloads

OpenAIRE Views

Publicly Funded

No
Impulse
Average
Influence
Average
Popularity
Average

Research Projects

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper focuses on cabotage which is a long-standing regulation that restricts coastal trade to domestic ships. As globalisation has grown global trade organisations have pushed for the removal of these barriers to promote a competitive market environment. In this research Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to evaluate and compare the efficiencies of countries which have protectionist and liberalised cabotage policies. To do this maritime statistics in 2022 from the World Bank database are considered for 50 different countries. We find that both protectionist and liberal policies have advantages and disadvantages but neither is inherently superior. In addition cabotage policies must be structured according to each country's conditions and a delicate balance must be established between these policies considering the dynamics of the global economy. This paper has also considered advantages and disadvantages by comparing countries that have different policies on cabotage such as the UK and T & uuml,rkiye to show how cabotage regulations generate different perspectives created by their respective maritime pasts and geopolitics. In terms of an effective and competitive maritime industry the study is one of the unique types of research that underlines the need for a cabotage strategy balanced between the liberalised and protectionist components.

Description

Keywords

Cabotage, protectionism, liberalism, maritime trade, maritime policy, market liberalization, Maritime Policy, Cabotage, Protectionism, Liberalism, Maritime Trade, Market Liberalization

Fields of Science

Citation

WoS Q

Scopus Q

OpenCitations Logo
OpenCitations Citation Count
N/A

Source

Maritime Policy & Management

Volume

53

Issue

2

Start Page

1

End Page

16
PlumX Metrics
Citations

Scopus : 0

Captures

Mendeley Readers : 7

Google Scholar Logo
Google Scholar™
OpenAlex Logo
OpenAlex FWCI
0.0

Sustainable Development Goals