Advanced exergoeconomic evaluation of a heat pump food dryer
Loading...

Date
2014
Authors
Zafer Erbay
A. Hepbasli
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Academic Press
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
In this study the results of conventional and advanced exergoeconomic analyses of the performance of a pilot scale air-source heat pump food dryer were compared for the first time. The contributions of the components of the drying system to the exergetic cost effectiveness of the dryer were evaluated and the effects of changing the inlet drying temperature were determined. The most important system component was determined to be the heat recovery unit followed by the condenser with respect to the reducing potentials for the total costs of the overall system. Decreasing temperature caused an increase in the cost performance of drying. The modification of the system components for improving the efficiency of the system can be effectively determined through advanced exergoeconomic approach by stating the realistic potential improvements and the priorities in the system. © 2014 IAgrE. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Description
Keywords
Advanced Exergoeconomy, Advanced Exergy, Drying, Exergoeconomics, Exergy, Heat Pump, Drying, Exergy, Heat Pump Systems, Waste Heat, Drying Temperature, Exergoeconomic Analysis, Exergoeconomics, Exergoeconomy, Heat Pumps, Heat Recovery Unit, Realistic Potentials, System Components, Dryers (equipment), Drying, Exergy, Heat pump systems, Waste heat, Drying temperature, Exergoeconomic analysis, Exergoeconomics, Exergoeconomy, Heat pumps, Heat recovery unit, Realistic potentials, System components, Dryers (equipment)
Fields of Science
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 02 engineering and technology
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
47
Source
Biosystems Engineering
Volume
124
Issue
Start Page
29
End Page
39
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 47
Scopus : 53
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 63
Google Scholar™


