Effect of urban geometry on pedestrian-level wind velocity
Loading...

Date
2014
Authors
Celen Ayse Arkon
Unver Ozkol
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Open Access Color
BRONZE
Green Open Access
Yes
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
The orientation of the streets and the height of continuous buildings cut off summer breezes and the prevailing wind in Izmir Turkey. Compared with the northern parts of Turkey the summer period in Izmir is relatively hot humid and long. Due to the dense urban structure and the expansion of hard surface materials the temperature in the city centre is higher than this centre's surroundings and this effect is called the urban heat island. Consequently pedestrian comfort in the city drops dramatically especially in locations where the wind flow is obstructed by buildings. In addition natural ventilation through the building facades is weakened due to the low average wind speed in the streets. For better outdoor and indoor comfort the citizens in Izmir should benefit from the prevailing wind and summer breezes locally named 'imbat' in the sea-land direction. Therefore the existing situation is examined through the field study in order to understand the natural ventilation potential at the pedestrian level in the selected main streets in Izmir.
Description
Keywords
urban geometry, UHI mitigation, field study, wind speed, wind direction, urban canyon, SUMMER WEATHER CONDITIONS, AIR-FLOW DISTRIBUTION, VENTILATION PURPOSES, STREET CANYON, CLIMATE, TEMPERATURE, DISPERSION, HOT, MODELS, IMPACT, Urban geometry, Field study, Urban canyon, Wind effects, UHI mitigation, Wind speed
Fields of Science
0211 other engineering and technologies, 02 engineering and technology, 01 natural sciences, 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
22
Source
Architectural Science Review
Volume
57
Issue
Start Page
4
End Page
19
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 2
Scopus : 27
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 70
Google Scholar™


