Determinants of organic wine consumption behavior from the perspective of the theory of planned behavior
Loading...

Date
2021
Authors
Aylin Caliskan
Duygu Celebi
Ige Pirnar
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
Open Access Color
Green Open Access
No
OpenAIRE Downloads
OpenAIRE Views
Publicly Funded
No
Abstract
Purpose Focusing only on the characteristics of the wine and the type of production is insufficient to give a holistic idea on consumer's organic wine consumption behavior. Therefore this study aims to examine the impact of attitude perceived behavioral organic wine consumption theory of planned behavior (TPB) control and subjective norms on organic wine consumption intention and behavior. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on the TPB a theoretical model was developed and tested by partial least squares structural equation modeling method. The sample of the research consists of 304 participants from the vineyards in Izmir/Turkey. Findings The main result of this study reveals that the theoretical model belonging to the TPB is also valid in the case of organic wine consumption behavior. Specifically research results indicate that attitude has the strongest direct impact on intention and indirect impact on organic wine consumption behavior while perceived behavioral control has the least impact. Originality/value Prediction of organic wine consumption behavior from the perspective of the TPB presents the originality of this paper.
Description
Keywords
Organic wine, Organic wine consumption, Theory of planned behavior, Wines, Consumer behavior, Partial least squares structural equation modeling, PURCHASE INTENTIONS, CONSUMER-BEHAVIOR, FOOD-CONSUMPTION, FISH CONSUMPTION, SUBJECTIVE NORMS, MODERATING ROLE, ATTITUDES, PERCEPTION, IMPACT, GREEN
Fields of Science
0301 basic medicine, 03 medical and health sciences
Citation
WoS Q
Scopus Q

OpenCitations Citation Count
32
Source
International Journal of Wine Business Research
Volume
33
Issue
Start Page
360
End Page
376
Collections
PlumX Metrics
Citations
CrossRef : 31
Scopus : 38
Captures
Mendeley Readers : 107
Google Scholar™


