Cagri BulutFIGEN SÜTAYBulut, CagriSütay, Fıgen2025-10-222023Altuntas G. & Donmez D. (2009). Girişimcilik yönelimi ve örgütsel performans ilişkisi: Çanakkale bölgesinde faaliyet gösteren otel işletmelerinde bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi 1-50.Bolton D. L. & Lane M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Education + Training 219-233.Brennan M. C. & McGowan P. (2006). Academic entrepreneurship: an exploratory case study . International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 12 (3) 144-164.Bulut C. & Aslan G. (2014). Üniversitelerde gerçekleşen girişimcilik faaliyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Management Economics and Business 119-129.Busenitz L. W. (1999). Entrepreneurial risk and strategic decision making: It’s a matter of perspective. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science.Cagle M. & Ozen A. (2019). Girişimcilik yönelimi ve finansal performans ilişkisinin araştırılmasında aile şirketlerinin moderatör rolü. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi 879-902.Chung Y.-Y. & Chen M.-H. (October 2020). Creative entrepreneurs’ creativity opportunity recognition and career success: Is resource availability a double-edged sword? European Management Journal 750-762.Covin J. G. & Miles M. P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23 (3) 47-63.Covin J. G. & Slevin D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign enviroments. Strategic Management Journal 10(1) 75-87.Crant M. J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management 26 (3) 435-462.Davis D. Morris M. & Allen J. (1991). Perceived environmental turbulence and its effect on selected entrepreneurship marketing and organizational characteristics in industrial firms. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (1) 43-51.Day R. & Allen T. D. (2004). The relationship between career motivation and self-efficacy with protege career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior 64 72-91.Etzkowitz H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in american academic science. Minerva 198-233.Ferreira F. A. Marques C. S. Bento P. Ferreira J. J. & Jalali M. S. (2015). Operationalizing and measuring individual entrepreneurial orientation using cognitive mapping and MCDA techniques. Journal of Business Research 68 2691-2702.Fiş A. M. & Wasti A. S. (2009). Örgüt kültürü ve girişimcilik yönelimi ilişkisi. METU Studies In Development 127-164.Frese M. & Fay D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior 133-187.Fugate M. & Kinicki A. J. (2008). A dispositional approach to employability: development of a measure and test of implications for employee reactions to organizational change . Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 81 503-527.Huyghe A. & Knockaert M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. The Journal of Technology Transfer 40 (1) 138-160.Hyun J. J. & Jeongsik L. J. (2014). The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative. Research Policy 43 74-91.Kanfer R. & Ackerman P. L. (2004). Aging adult development and work motivation. Academy of Management Review 29 (3) 440-458.Knight G. A. (1997). Cross-Cultural reliability and validity of a scale to measure firm entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Venturing 12 (3) 213-225.Knockaert M. Foo M. D. Erikson T. & Cools E. (2015). Growth intentions among research scientists: A cognitive style perspective. Technovation 38 64-74.Koe W.-L. (2016). The relationship between individual entrepreneurial orientation (ieo) and entrepreneurial intention. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 6-13.Kreiser P. M. Marino L. D. & Weaver K. (2002). Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: a multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practise 26 (4) 71-93.London M. (1983). Toward a theory of career motivation. Academy of Management Review 8 (4) 620-630.Louis K. S. Blumenthal D. Gluck M. E. & Stoto M. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs in Academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly 34 110-131.Lumpkin G. T. & Dess G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21 (1) 135–172. 21 135-172.Lumpkin G. & Dess G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing 16 429-451.Lundqvist A. M. & Middleton K. L. (2013). Academic entrepreneurship revisited – university scientists and venture creation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 20 (3) 603-617.Mazzoni T. L. & Clugston R. M. (1987). Big business as a policy innovator in state school reform: a minnesota case study. EEPA.Miller D. & Friesen P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal 3 (1) 1-25.Mintzberg H. & McHugh A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (2) 160-197.Mishra P. & McDonald K. (2017). Career resilience: an integrated review of the empirical literature. Human Resource Development Review 16 (3) 207-234.Obschonka M. Silbereisen R. K. & Schmitt-Rodermund E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior 77 63-72.Ozgul U. & Kunday O. (2015). Conceptual development of academic entrepreneurial intentions scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 195 881-887.Palich L. E. & Bagby D. R. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing 425-438.Philpott K. Dooley L. O'Reilly C. & Lupton G. (2011). The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions. Technovation 31 161-170.Prodan I. & Drnovsek M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic-entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical test. Technovation 332-347.Seibert S. E. Kraimer M. L. & Crant M. J. (2001). What do proactive people do? a longitudinal model unking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology 54 845-874.Shane S. (2004). Encouraging university entrepreneurship? the effect of the bayh-dole act on university patenting in the United States. Journal of Business Venturing 19 127-151.Shore C. & McLauchlan L. (2012). 'Third mission' activities commercialisation and academic entrepreneurs. Social Anthropology 20 (3) 267-286.Siegel D. & Wright M. (2015 October). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management 26(4) 582-595.Stevenson H. H. & Jarillo J. C. (2007). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. In A. Cuervo D. Ribeiro & S. Roig (Eds.) Entrepreneurship Concepts Theory and Perspective (pp. 155-170). Berlin: Springer.VanDam K. Oreg S. & Schyns B. (2008). Daily work contexts and resistance to organisational change: the role of leader– member exchange development climate and change process characteristics. Applied Psychology: An International Review 57 (2) 313-334.Wanberg C. R. & Banas J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (1) 132-142.Woods M. S. (2011). A process model of academic entrepreneurship. Business Horizons 54 153-161.Yepez E. Marin-Carillo G. M. Casado-Belmonte M. & Capobianco-Uriarte M. M. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Review of its evolution and new trends. Journal of Cleaner Production.1302-32841308-091110.16953/deusosbil.1274508https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10525https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/en/yayin/detay/1181820Girişimciliğin ekonomik gelişme ve istihdam üzerindeki etkilerini ortaya koyan araştırma sayısının artması girişimcilik ve girişimciliğe ilişkin kavramlara yönelik ilginin de hızla artmasına yol açmaktadır. Bilim insanlarının kariyerleri boyunca yaptıkları araştırmalar edindikleri bilgi ve deneyimlerini ticarileştirmeleri ekonomik ve sosyal fayda yaratmaları akademik girişimciliğin çıkış noktası olarak ifade edilmektedir. Üniversitelerin öğretme ve araştırma görevlerini ekonomik kalkınma ile uyumlaştırılması sonucu ortaya çıkan girişimci üniversite kavramı akademik girişimcilik kavramına temel oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışmada akademik personelin girişimcilik yönelimlerinin akademik personelin kariyer motivasyonuna etkileri araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmanın temel amacı ise, kariyer motivasyonunu belirleyen akademik girişimcilik boyutlarını belirlemektir. Araştırma verisi Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi (DEÜ) bünyesinde fakültelerde çalışan 1425 akademik personel ile gerçekleştirilen ve 81 cevabın elde edildiği online anket ile toplanmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre, kariyer motivasyonunu belirleyen akademik girişimcilik boyutunun yenilikçilik olduğu söylenebilir.Türkçeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEğitim- Eğitim Araştırmaları-İşletmeİşletmeEğitim, Eğitim AraştırmalarıArticle