Norbert MeskoMarta KowalAndras LangFerenc KocsorSzabolcs A. BandiAdam PutzPiotr SorokowskiDavid A. FrederickFelipe E. GarciaLeonardo A. AguilarAnna StudzinskaChee-Seng TanBiljana GjoneskaTaciano L. MilfontMerve Topcu BulutDmitry GrigoryevToivo AavikMahmoud BoussenaAlan D. A. MattiassiReza AfhamiRizwana AminRoberto BaioccoHamdaoui BrahimAli R. CanJoao CarneiroHakan CetinkayaDimitri ChubinidzeEliane DeschrijverYahya DonDmitrii DubrovIzzet DuyarMarija JovicJulia A. KamburidisFarah KhanHareesol Khun-InkeereeMaida Koso-DrljevicDavid LackoKarlijn MassarMara MorelliJean C. NatividadeEllen K. NyhusJu Hee ParkFarid PazhoohiEkaterine PirtskhalavaKoen PonnetPavol ProkopDusana SakanSingha TulyakulAustin H. WangSibele D. AquinoDerya D. Atamturk AtamturkNana BurduliAntonio ChirumboloSeda DuralEdgardo EtchezaharNasim Ghahraman MoharrampourBalazs AczelLuca KozmaSamuel LinsEfisio ManuntaTiago MarotMoises MebarakKirill G. MiroshnikKatarina MiseticMarietta Papadatou-PastouBence BakosFatima Zahra SahliSangeeta SinghCaglar SolakTatiana VolkodavAnna WlodarczykGrace AkelloMarios ArgyridesOgeday CokerKatarzyna GalasinskaTalia Gomez YepesAleksander KobylarekMiguel Landa-BlancoMarlon MayorgaBaris OzenerMa. Criselda T. PacquingMarc Eric S. ReyesAysegul SahinWilliam Tamayo-AgudeloGulmira TopanovaEzgi Toplu-DemirtasBelguzar N. TurkanMarcos Zumarraga-EspinosaSimone GrassiniJan AntfolkClement CornecKatarzyna PisanskiSabrina StockliStephanie Josephine EderHyemin Han2025-10-0620240004-00021573-280010.1007/s10508-023-02724-1http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-023-02724-1https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/7947The current study investigates attitudes toward one form of sex for resources: the so-called sugar relationships which often involve exchanges of resources for sex and/or companionship. The present study examined associations among attitudes toward sugar relationships and relevant variables (e.g. sex sociosexuality gender inequality parasitic exposure) in 69924 participants across 87 countries. Two self-report measures of Acceptance of Sugar Relationships (ASR) developed for younger companion providers (ASR-YWMS) and older resource providers (ASR-OMWS) were translated into 37 languages. We tested cross-sex and cross-linguistic construct equivalence cross-cultural invariance in sex differences and the importance of the hypothetical predictors of ASR. Both measures showed adequate psychometric properties in all languages (except the Persian version of ASR-YWMS). Results partially supported our hypotheses and were consistent with previous theoretical considerations and empirical evidence on human mating. For example at the individual level sociosexual orientation traditional gender roles and pathogen prevalence were significant predictors of both ASR-YWMS and ASR-OMWS. At the country level gender inequality and parasite stress positively predicted the ASR-YWMS. However being a woman negatively predicted the ASR-OMWS but positively predicted the ASR-YWMS. At country-level ingroup favoritism and parasite stress positively predicted the ASR-OMWS. Furthermore significant cross-subregional differences were found in the openness to sugar relationships (both ASR-YWMS and ASR-OMWS scores) across subregions. Finally significant differences were found between ASR-YWMS and ASR-OMWS when compared in each subregion. The ASR-YWMS was significantly higher than the ASR-OMWS in all subregions except for Northern Africa and Western Asia.EnglishResources for sex, Sugar relationships, Cross-cultural comparison, Human matingTRANSACTIONAL SEX, SOCIOSEXUALITY, CULTURE, EVOLUTIONARY, PREVALENCE, ORIGINS, STRESS, TRANSLATION, PREFERENCES, STRATEGIESArticle