Rafail ALİZADESerpil GÜNGÖR2025-10-222018Alizade R. Bilhan G. and Smith P. F. Modules whose maximal submodules have supplements. Communications in Algebra 29(6):2389 2405 2001.Anderson F. and Fuller K. Rings and Categories of Modules . Springer 1992.B¸y¸ka³ k E. and Lomp C. Rings whose modules are weakly supplemented are perfect. applications to certain ring extensions . Mathematica Scandinavica 105:25 30 2009.Çal ³ c H. and Pancar A. -co nitely supplemented modules . Czechoslovak Math-ematical Journal 54(129):1083 1088 2004.Clark J. Lomp C. Vanaja N. and Wisbauer R. Lifting Modules. Birkh‰user Verlag 2006.Fuchs L. In nite Abelian Groups Vol. I . New York: Academic Press 1970.Idelhadj A. and Tribak R. A dual notion of cs-modules generalization . Algebra and Number Theory Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math. Marcel Dekker New York 208:149 155 2000.Idelhadj A. and Tribak R. On some properties of -supplemented modules. Inter-national Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 69:4373 4387 2003.Kasch F. Modules and Rings. London Mathematical Society 1982.Keskin D. Harmanc A. and Smith P. F. On -supplemented modules. Acta Mathematica Hungaria 83(1-2):161 169 1999.Keskin D. Smith P. F. and Xue W. Rings whose modules are -supplemented. Journal of Algebra 218:470 487 1999.Mohamed S. H. and M¸ller B. J. Continuous and Discrete Modules . London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge UK 1990.Wang Y. and Sun Q. A note on -co nitely supplemented modules . International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2007:10836 5 pages 2007.War eld Jr. R. B. Decomposability of nitely presented modules . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society 25(1):167 172 1970.Wisbauer R. Foundations of Modules and Rings . Gordon and Breach 1991.Zˆschinger H. Komplementierte moduln ¸ber dedekindringen . Journal of Algebra 29:42 56 1974.Zˆschinger H. Moduln die in jeder erweiterung ein komplement haben . Mathematica Scandinavica 35:267 287 1974.Zˆschinger H. and Rosenberg F. A. Koatomare moduln. Mathematische Zeitschrift 170(3):221 232 19801303-50102651-477X10.15672/HJMS.20154413844https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/10923In this paper it is shown that a factor module of an ⊕-co-coatomically supplemented module is not in general ⊕-co-coatomically supplemented. If M is⊕-co-coatomically supplemented and U is a fully invariant submodule of M then M/U is ⊕-co-coatomically supplemented. A ring R is left perfect if and only if R(N) is an ⊕-co-coatomically supplemented R-module. A projective module M is co-coatomically semiperfect if and only if M is ⊕-co-coatomically supplemented. A ring is semiperfect if and only if every nitely generated free R-module is co-coatomically semiperfect.İngilizceMatematikArticle