Sinan AlperElif Oyku UsAlper, SinanUs, Elif Öykü2025-10-0620211046-13101936-473310.1007/s12144-019-00372-02-s2.0-85069215796http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00372-0https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/6502https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00372-0We hypothesized that perceived intentionality is one of the factors explaining why terrorism is perceived to be a more important problem than traffic accidents. In Study 1 we conducted an experiment on a large Turkish sample (N = 385) and found that participants suggested allocating significantly more budget to prevent terror-related deaths as compared to deaths caused by traffic accidents and this difference was fully mediated by perceived intentionality. In Study 2 which was pre-registered we hypothesized that American participants (N = 450) would similarly suggest allocating more budget to prevent deaths caused by terrorist incidents as compared to traffic accidents but this difference would disappear when traffic accidents are portrayed as involving a perpetrator consciously disregarding the safety of others. Our hypothesis was partially supported. We discuss the potential implications for policy-makers and social psychological research.Englishinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessIntentionality, Moral judgment, Traffic, TerrorMORAL DYAD, PSYCHOLOGY, SUPPORT, THREAT, HARMTerrorIntentionalityMoral JudgmentTRAFFICArticle