Ecehan OzmehmetEbru AlakavukAlakavuk, EbruOzmehmet, EcehanH CaliskanI OnderE MasalS Besoluk2025-10-0620162261-242410.1051/shsconf/20162601112http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601112https://gcris.yasar.edu.tr/handle/123456789/6043https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601112The formulations of studios are the most critical problem of design studies because the foundation of further architectural education is based on these design studios. This paper focuses on discussions of studio-based design learning systems and curriculum developments on integral design studios that aims significant and innovative frameworks. In this context integrated design studios are the newest approaches of architectural education. In this education system every studio has its own integral course. Integral courses give support to the design studios. This support can be either theoretical or practical. Knowledge that is related with the context of the design studio can be explained in this integrated course in some cases in some cases as simulation program can be explained in some parts of the course. The support of the integral courses to the studios must be evaluated deeply. This paper presents the positive parts and negative parts of the new integral studio approach in this context. By this way strong and weak parts of this education system is put forward.Englishinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessIntegration process of theoretical courses with design studios in undergraduate education: Case studies of architecture and interior design studiosConference Object