Repository logoGCRIS
  • English
  • Türkçe
  • Русский
Log In
New user? Click here to register. Have you forgotten your password?
Home
Communities
Browse GCRIS
Entities
Overview
GCRIS Guide
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Čam, Nezir Yaǧiz"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Article
    Citation - Scopus: 1
    Analysis and design of an air to air heat exchanger used in energy recovery systems
    (Erol Kurt, 2022) Helin Ülgen Elmacioǧlu; Irem Özsevgin; Cennet Kocabiyik; Nezir Yağız Çam; Levent Bilir; Elmacioǧlu, Helin Ülgen; Kocabiyik, Cennet; Özsevgin, Irem; Bilir, Levent; Čam, Nezir Yaǧiz
    With the continuous worldwide energy use increase energy efficiency is gaining high importance. Consequently many methods have been investigated for potential energy savings. One of these methods is the use of heat recovery systems. These systems basically re-use waste heat and reduce energy consumption. Also they are increasingly used to reduce heating and cooling demands of buildings. Their main feature is to provide fresh air to the place which is heated by the exhaust air with the help of a heat exchanger (HEX) working between two different temperature sources. The most commonly used types of heat exchangers in ventilation systems are cross-flow and counter-flow heat exchangers. Cross-flow heat exchangers have a thermal efficiency in the range of 50-75% while counter-flow heat exchangers have 75-95%. Many studies have been carried out to increase the efficiency of this type of heat exchangers. In this study different designs of crossflow and counter-flow exchangers are compared using ANSYS Fluent software. The aim is to determine how the plate surface geometry affects heat transfer and pressure drop. It is aimed to find the optimum design with maximum efficiency high heat transfer and low pressure drop for heat exchangers. As a result it has been observed that thermal efficiency increased from 18% to 60% when changing from cross flow to counter flow in flat plate design while it increased from 25% to 77% in enhanced plate designs. For enhanced designs counter flow heat exchanger is 52% more efficient than cross flow heat exchanger. Also improvements to increase the surface area and turbulence in both flow types have increased heat transfer and thermal efficiency. © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Repository logo
Collections
  • Scopus Collection
  • WoS Collection
  • TrDizin Collection
  • PubMed Collection
Entities
  • Research Outputs
  • Organizations
  • Researchers
  • Projects
  • Awards
  • Equipments
  • Events
About
  • Contact
  • GCRIS
  • Research Ecosystems
  • Feedback
  • OAI-PMH

Log in to GCRIS Dashboard

GCRIS Mobile

Download GCRIS Mobile on the App StoreGet GCRIS Mobile on Google Play

Powered by Research Ecosystems

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Feedback